The Premises - Judgment Search Results

Bcl Secure Premises (P) Ltd. Vs. Metro Railway, Kolkata

Court: Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side A.P.No.374 of 2017 BCL Secure Premises (P) LTD.versus Metro Railway, Kolkata For the petitioners:- Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Jishnu Saha..Sr.Adv.Srinanda Bose Pankaj Agarwal J.D.Roy …Advocates For the Respondent:-

Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Municipa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)107BOMLR843; 2005(1)MhLj547

fact that the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 are not applicable to the cases where the premises are occupied by the banks or financial institutions and no fault can be found with the order assessing … premises, it is also under the rating principles of Rebus-Stick -Stand bus to fix the reasonable rent of the premises under Section 154 of MMC Act.' After making the above nothings in the impugned order, it has been

Peacebird Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Collector of Stamps of Mumb ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR51; 2008(1)MhLj865

ownership basis were executed between the said Champaklal Chimanlal Shah on the one hand and individual tenants of the premises on the said three floors of the said building on the other hand. It was also agreed that

Harish Commercial Premises Co-op Soc. Ltd. Vs. Varsha Dinesh Joshi and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(2)ALLMR1; 2006(5)BomCR853

of land.5. The respondent Nos. 1 to 6 are claiming to be the owner of the shops/Bakdas in the premises of the petitioner society. They are in possession of the agreement of sale executed by the builder Bitesh … letter dated 27.8.1983 for the construction of the shop premises. In the permission it has been mentioned that the premises were actually situated on the road and they are affected by set back due to widening at Dawood

Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2010]320ITR414(Bom); [2004]140TAXMAN145(Bom)

and it was in pursuance of the aforesaid that the assessee insisted on transferees making certain payments before the premises could be registered in the records of the society in their names. He took us through all the … fee. In the case of non-payment of transfer fee on sale of premises, the deal fails through and the premises are not transferred. The Appellant itself is accounting regular contributions in the income account and the transfer fee

Sterling Centre Premises Owners Co-op. Societies Ltd. Vs. Nanubhai R. ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2006)3GLR1853

Matched in: Parties Sterling Centre Premises Owners Co-op. Societies Ltd. Vs. Nanubhai R. Shah - Prop. of Dash Publicity and anr.

Suku Premises Development Pvt Ltd and 1 - Petitioners Vs. State of Guj ...

Court: Gujarat

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value =...

Usha Sunder Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Nilang Desai and Ot ...

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Usha Sunder Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Nilang Desai and Others

Apeejay Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., and Another Vs. Nishar Ahm ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR468; (1990)85CTR(Bom)46; [1990]185ITR487(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Apeejay Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., and Another Vs. Nishar Ahmed and Another

Kiran Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Janata Kamgar Union ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR494; 2001(4)BomCR550; (2001)3BOMLR180; [2001(89)FLR707]; (2001)ILLJ1499Bom; 2001(4)MhLj665

a legal and juristic personality independent of its members who are the share holders of the society owning the premises in their own right. The business, trade or commercial activities of the members cannot be mixed up with … were carried on by the society. There is a statement made in their evidence about the activities in the premises of the members but nothing about the society's activities. On the contrary the society's secretary has clearly stated