The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Sorted by: recent Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.885 seconds)A. Ramaswamy (Died) and Others Vs. K. Rama Murthy (Died) and Others
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(2)ALD13; 1999(2)ALT1
suit 36 in state of gujarat v the ghanshyam salt works air1979guj215 the gujarat high court held as follows arbitration act on adjourning from one day to another suo motu even mentioning that defendants to pay costs of rs 20 does not not entitled to seek stay of proceedings as by that act either directly or indirectly he will have subjected himself io 1991 in os no 471 of 1990 dated 31 7 1992 on the file of the iv additional judge city civil
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Weld Flux Industries
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : (1999)(84)LC525Tri(Mum.)bai
the collector appeals set aside the appeal filed by the department on the ground as stated above 3 arguing the case the collector under section 35e 2 of the central excises act 1944 that the collector was requested to examine the merits of the writ appeal c m p no 9662 of 1992 also is dismissed 4 shri k k gupta ld advocate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndhra University Parirakshana Joint Action Committee, Waltair, Visakh ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD439; 1999(1)ALT366
to the act 26 in krishna kakkanth v govt of kerala air1997sc128 the supreme court observed thus to ascertain unreasonableness and has filed this present writ petition in the form of public interest litigation the grounds on which he seeks to attack 14 of the constitution hence as per the provisions of amendment act 13 of 1995 even a member of the executive into a highly enlightened body 17 section 9 of the act provides the officers of the university they are the chancellor
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Laxman Rao Vs. State of A.P.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD543; 1999(1)ALT506; 1999CriLJ1928
the school admission register which can be considered as a public document and it is the authenticated true extracts of such the possibility of mistake in transferring the entry or in mentioning the date of birth in the certificate purporting to be 90 under section 376 ipc issued fir and took up investigation subsequently charge sheet was filed under section 376 ipc and of the evidence act but section 65 of the evidence act lays down an embargo that in respect of a public
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMd. Kamarudjama, Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanumakonda and Another Vs. E ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD715; 1999(1)ALT608; 1999CriLJ1995
for deciding the proposition mentioned supra and strengthens our reasoning mentioned above it may be relevant to extract the principles stated the code of civil procedure 8 an order varying or amending a decree 9 an order refusing leave to sue informa only for the purpose of payment of increments only when action for contempt was initiated in cc no 1651 of 1997 first being in t vasantha lakshmi v principal apswr school 1992 2 aplj 77 which was further followed by later division
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpecial Deputy Collector, (L.A.O), Anakapalli Vs. Padala Venkata Raman ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(2)ALD115; 1999(2)ALT54
learned judge in koyappathodi m ayisha umma v state of kerala 1991 3scr548 it was observed at paragraph 6 it is to at all and they were simply ignored considerations of public interest were blatantly forsaken the result is complete miscarriage of then observed that the principles laid down in the afore mentioned cases cannot be applied to the facts of that case g manikyam that decision insofar it lays down that the actual income from the trees should be capitalised by applying a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLand Acquisition Officer-cum-special Deputy Collector Vs. Annam Reddi ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(5)ALD376; 1999(5)ALT74
on the decision in p k ramachandran v state of kerala 1997 7 scc 566 their lordships observed that impugned order individually affected but what in the ultimate analysis suffers is public interest the decisions of government are collective and institutional decisions delivery between july and december 1995 in the cases above mentioned is a matter of guess however one possibility is that judge and many other officer of court was charged of corruption and arrested inaction or lapse not attributable to deliberate design ahead with the enquiry the state government had already ordered investigation by cbcid number of financial irregularities and manipulations including tampering remain in force once the act is repealed unless repealing act provided otherwise altogether three affidavits have been filed either because 1992 op 62 of 1992 and 26 other ops of 1992 were disposed of in a batch on 3 4 1995
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPulusu Perireddy Vs. Govt. of A.P., Panchayat Raj Dept. Hyd. and Other ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD453
only the office bearers should be elected to discharge certain public functions but they should be allowed to function freely and has not considered all the provisions of the panchayat raj act it is further asserted by him that he issued whip
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD. Ramulu Vs. State of A.P.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD554; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)612
his evidence constitutes improvement inasmuch as it does not find mention in his statement given to the police for instance there related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by by the sessions judge karimnagar in sc no 146 of 1992 tinder which the appellant has been convicted for the offence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDivine Medical Centre (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Wealth
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on : Dec-31-1998
Reported in : (1999)71ITD238(Coch.)
1992 93 the assessee is a company in which the public are not substantially interested as per the memorandum of association 40 in the finance act 1983 it ma v be mentioned that section 40 of the finance act revived in a of sub section 3 of section 40 of the finance act 1983 at the time of hearing shri k kittu advocate wealth tax assessments for the assessment years 1986 87 to 1992 93 the assessee is a company in which the public
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT