Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

The Information Technology Act 2000 Section 75 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates Vs. Uoi

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-22-2005

the form of electronic record as defined in clause (t) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … report was under consideration of the Assembly. This document could not be treated as a public document under section 75 of the Evidence Act read with section 2(17)(g) and (h) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This view


Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-22-2005

the form of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … report was under consideration of the Assembly. This document could not be treated as a public document under Section 75 of the Evidence Act read with Section 2(17)(g) and (h) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This view


Nov 10 2016

N. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-10-2016

applicant shall not only comply with the rules and regulations prescribed under the Act, but also comply with the Information Technology Act, 2000, including the intermediary guidelines. Rule 5 (3) is as under:- The applicant shall not own or lease any … or deemed to have been registered under any enactment for the time being in force ; vi) Ex-servicemen. Section 75 of the Act deals with scheme for renting of motor cabs and is as under:- 75. Scheme for


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 06 2023

Abhilash John vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-06-2023

of Children from Sexual Offences, Act, 2012 (for short, “POCSO Act”), Sections 67B (a), (b) & (c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, “IT Act”) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015


Jun 05 2023

XXX vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-05-2023

15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012 (for short “POCSO Act”), Section 67B (a),(b),(c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “IT Act”), and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015


Jul 06 2023

Sudheep Kumar P.S vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-06-2023

of Children from Sexual Offences, Act, 2012 (for short, “POCSO Act”), Sections 67B (a), (b) & (c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, “IT Act”) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015


Jul 24 2020

Fathima a.S. vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-24-2020

4 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012 ('POCSO Act') and under Section 67B(d) of the Information Technology Act,2000 (I.T.Act). Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is also alleged against


Nov 24 2021

Nidheesh.S vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-24-2021

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 and Section 75 of Juvenile Justice and Section 66(E) of Information Technology Act, 2000.2. Petitioner is the sole accused in the above crime. Thesecond respondent is the defacto complainant and presently


Feb 21 2025

R.Sachin Vignaraja vs the State Rep, by. the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-21-2025

74, 75, 78, 351(3) of BNS and Section 75 of JJ Act, 2015 r/w 66E, 67B of IT Act, 2000. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner had morphed the photos of the victim and … Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.21.02.2025 ata Page No.4 of 6 Copy to: 1.The Sub Inspector of


Oct 08 2025

Pramodh K vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-08-2025

IN CRIME NO.30/2025 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 67, 66(C) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 351(2), 351(3), 352, 75(1)(iv), 79 OF BNS 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 45TH ACJM


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial