The Electricity Act 2003 Section 4 - Judgment Search Results

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Ramesh D. Devnani

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2005Guj66; (2005)2GLR1202

power conferred by or under this Act. The aforesaid section is to be read with section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 153 of Electricity Act, 2003 reads as under:'153. Constitution of Special Courts- (1) The State Government may, for … injunction application before the trial court and the same has also been produced before this court at page 48 onwards at Annexure 'C' collectively. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that immediately

Vidyut Upbhokta Association Society and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(1)MPHT379; 2005(4)MPLJ397

whether Sections 2 (j), 3, 4 and 5 of the V.S. Act are inconsistent with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and therefore, inapplicable.5. Section 185 of the Electricity Act saves the provisions of the V.S. Act, which are

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008LC(SC)527; 2008(9)SCALE824; (2008)10SCC321

and economy in the activities of the electricity industry to achieve the objects and purposes of the Act. The Electricity Act, 2003, which has replaced the ERC Act after hearings in this case were concluded, also specifically refers to the … to ordinary consumers, (ii) supply to public lamps; and (iii) supply to consumers under special agreement. Referring to Section 4 (1)(d),(e) and (f) of the 1903 Act Mr. Venugopal submitted that a licence issued under the said Act

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)2MLJ703

Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to … Act.2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under … stood in the name of his vendor Mrs. Vijayalakshmi in Patta No. 409, the petitioner has applied for transfer of patta in his name. According

Orissa Power Generation Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulatory ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR2005Ori125

now been filed by Gridco numbered as case No. 13 of 2002.30. We may mention here that the Electricity Act, 2003 has come into force during the pendency of the writ petition and Section 185(3) thereof provides that the … State Government of Orissa holds 51 per cent of equity shares and AES Corporation, U. S. A. holds 49 per.cent of equity shares. OPGC carries on the business of generation of electricity from thermal energy at its

Rahdey Shyam Bansal Vs. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 148(2008)DLT462

an order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma, Delhi ('Special Judge') under the Electricity Act, 2003 ('Act') in Criminal Complaint No. 217 of 2005 whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 152 … ORDERS. Muralidhar, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('CrPC') challenges an order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the

Jarnail Singh and Another Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Transmissi ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

and violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioners have also challenged the validity of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as âEA, 2003â? for the sake of convenience), the Govt. Resolution dated 24.8.2006, first proviso … state transmission utility and also a licensee as declared under Sections 38 and 14 of the EA, 2003. 4. There is a power generation unit set up under an explanation project at Koradi Thermal Power Station. The

Rakhee Gupta Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court: Mumbai

aforesaid extent. Rule is accordingly made absolute with parties to bear their respective costs of the Petition. Indian Electricity Act, 2003 Section 125, Section 127 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 to Section 24 Condonation of Delay On receipt final assessment … dealt with by the 3 Sections above being different no useful purpose would be served by referring to Section 4 or Section 6 of the Indian Stamp Act for determining the scope of Section 5 or for construing

Ms.Jairaj Ispat Limited, Rep. by Its Ma Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulator ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

petitions are maintainable in view of the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003, against the impugned order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission? 2) Whether the Andhra Pradesh Power … Regulation 55 of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 to condone such delay? 4) Whether the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission is obligated to comply with the principles of natural justice while

The Tata Power Company Limited, Rep. by B.J. Shroff Vs. Maharashtra El ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Maharashtra swore an affidavit on 11.06.2010 to the effect that the Government did not exercise its power under section 11 or section 37 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and that the Memoranda dated 7.05.2010 and 19.05.2010 are … Hon’ble MERC, to kindly issue further instructions to SLDC Kalwa for scheduling power as per the provisions in the Electricity Act,2003” 5. In this situation the appellant filed a writ application on 19.05.2010 before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court … also mentioned that the TPTCL was already granted open access for scheduling. 4. But the MSLDC refused to concede to the appellant’s request for scheduling