Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 22 the planning board Sorted by: old Page 7 of about 3,565 results (5.068 seconds)

Shri Agnelo Alexinho Lobo, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at House No. 67 ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR273

..... framework of the law underwhich the enquiry has to be held and theconstraints of the tribunal or body of personsappointed for that purpose. see saresh koshy jorgev. the university of kerala : [1969]1scr317 .the expression 'reasonable opportunity' has come upfor consideration before the apex court and thehigh courts, both under constitutional provisionsas also statutory ..... and, consequentlythe opportunity offered was sham; (e) the director of panchayats exercising powersunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210 ofthe panchayat raj act, acts as a quasi-judicialauthority and that being the case, he ought not tobe a judge in his own cause. in the instant case,the respondent no.1 ..... to be quashedand set aside. (f) the respondent no.1 when discharges functionsunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210-a ofthe act has to act as quasi-judicial authority andthe order passed must disclose reasons, more so inthe absence of any remedy of appeal or revision.apart from disclosing the reasons .....

Jiby P. Chacko Vs. Principal, Mediciti School of Nursing, Ghanpur, Ran ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD827

..... behaviour resulting in inconvenience to other students etc., the educational institution would only be acting administratively. however, in the matter of explusion or rustication, the same is not the case. this was explained in glynn v. keele university, (1971) 2 a11.er 89. the vice-chancellor of keele university took disciplinary action against a number of students who are found standing or sitting ..... court in unnikrishnan v. state of a.p., : [1993]1scr594 , 'private educational institutions do not perform an independent activity and they perform the activity supplemental to principal activity carried on by the state.' the educational institutions would not attract alumni unless the degrees and diplomas offered by them are recognised by the affiliating university or recognising agency like nursing council. the recognition .....

Department of Post Vs. Md. Tamijur Rahman

Court : Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

..... to the respondent/petitioner. 2. the case in brief is that the respondent/petitioner sent rs. 2,000/- by tmo to his daughter at aligarh university, aligarh on 26.7.1995 through the tezpur head post office, but the tmo was not delivered in time. when the respondent/petitioner brought this to the notice of the appellant/opposite party on ..... . 7. the appellant also brought to our notice a number of cases in which the national consumer disputes redressal commission has held that unless there is fraud, wilful act or default in the course of transmission by post, officers of the post office cannot be held liable. in this respect specific mention may be made to post master ..... such loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal articles in course of transmission by post. the respondent has not been able to prove that there was any wilful act or default on the part of the appellant nor there is anything which can be termed as fraudulent. we are, therefore, inclined to agree to the contention that .....

National Institute of Education Vs. Nav Bharat Shikshan Mandal,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR543

..... and has done a great deal of work inthe field of education. as the application of thefirst respondent was in conformity with the act andthe rules and the university had wrongly refused togranted permission, the state government wascompetent to exercise the power. it was in theabsolute discretion of the state government togrant ..... . though the questionwhich arose in that case was slightly differentinasmuch as it related to opening of a new medicalcollege under the maharashtra university of healthsciences act, 1998, and the meaning of theexpression 'management', while summing up thediscussion, certain principles have been laid downand it was held that the ..... sub-section(5) of section 82, despite the fact thatthe opening of the institution was beyond theperspective plan prepared by the university undersub-section (1) of section 82 of the act.35. considering the provisions of section 82 injuxtaposition of the (first) proviso to sub-section(5), the division bench observed:' .....

Dr. Biren Das Vs. Tezpur University and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... has described the composition of the selection committee as below :-i) mr. p. bhattacharjee, vice-chancellor, tezpur university,ii) mr. m. ahom, registrar, tezpur university,iii) prof. s.k. doloi, department of political science, tezpur university,iv) prof. d. konwar, department of energy, tezpur university, v) prof. b.d, phukan, department of electronics, tezpur university, vi) prof. m.k. choudhury, indian institute of technology, guwahati,viii) prof. r. bhaskaran, indian ..... of persons other than the persons not authorised by the statute. any recommendation made by the selection committee constituted in violation of the statutory provisions is void and cannot be acted upon. in this connection, we may refer to the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in j.k. public service commission v. dr. narinder mohan and ors. (1994) 2 .....

i.i.T.T. College of Engineering Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3629; 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)795; JT2003(7)SC86; 2003(6)SCALE237; (2003)7SCC73; (2003)3UPLBEC2400

..... the administrator. in spite of our repeated query, none of the counsel was able to point out any provision either under the aicte act or the hp education act or university act permitting the authorities to take over the management of institution. however, laudable the objective behind the steps taken by the high court, it ..... act. this contention need not be considered in view of the latest stand taken by ..... secretary to government higher education : [2000]2scr1234 , the university should not have withheld the affiliation inspite of the approval given earlier by aicte. it is contended that the provisions of the aicte act and regulations will prevail over the provisions if any in the university act or state which are inconsistent with the provisions of the former .....

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2004)49SCL117SAT

..... book - private international law (by paras diwan - former director indian institute of comparative and family law and formerly professor and chairman, department of law, punjab university) ".........the law of the domicile of the company governs not only matters relating to its constitution and dissolution and but also all other internal matters. thus the ..... amendment became effective; such liabilities are kept alive. in support of this he cited p. v. mohammad barmay vs. director of enforcement.a.i.r. 1993 s.c. 1188, 1192. the rights of the parties are concerned by the law as it existed at the time the proceedings were commenced and amendment ..... acquisition of companies, whether listed or unlisted and whether in india or abroad." 221. regulation 2 provides definition of certain expressions including ' control' 'person acting in concert' etc. referred to in the takeover regulations. the scope of these definitions cannot be abridged or enlarged for the purpose of administering the provisions .....

Saurashtra Education Foundation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Guj)295; [2005]273ITR139(Guj)

..... clauses shall not beincluded - (1) ... ... ... .... .... ... ... (22) any income of a university or othereducational institution, existing solely foreducational purposes and not for purposes ofprofit. this clause was omitted by finance (no.2) act,1998 w.e.f. 1.4.1999 and the following relevantsub-clauses were added as parts of clause ( ..... in various disciplines related to thecooperative movement.16. similar view was taken by this court incommissioner of income-tax vs . sorabji nusserwanjiparekh, : [1993]201itr939(guj) where the assessee was a trustwhich was primarily founded to establish a school orcollege for imparting instructions to zoroastrianstudents but it was not ..... sole trustee, loka shikshana trust vs . cit : [1975]101itr234(sc) which has also been subsequentlyapplied by this court in cit vs . sorabji nusserwanjiparekh, : [1993]201itr939(guj) and by the patna high court inbihar institute of mining and mine surveying vs . cit, : [1994]208itr608(patna) .6. before considering the rival .....

Hibbs Vs. Winn

Court : US Supreme Court

..... conditioning the jurisdictional bar on the availability of a plain, speedy and efficient remedy in state court. the remedy inspected in our decisions was not one designed for the universe of plaintiffs who sue the state. rather, it was a remedy tailor-made for taxpayers. see, e.g. , rosewell , 450 u. s., at 528 ( ..... make clear that the court treats states as diminished and disfavored powers, rather than merely applies statutory text. first, the court s analysis of the tax injunction act (tia or act), 28 u. s. c. 1341, contrasts with a literal reading of its terms. second, the court s assertion that legislative histories support the conclusion that ..... brought an action in federal court challenging 43 1089, and seeking to enjoin its operation, on establishment clause grounds. the question presented is whether the tax injunction act (tia or act), 28 u. s. c. 1341, which prohibits a lower federal court from restraining the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under state law, bars .....

Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2010]320ITR414(Bom); [2004]140TAXMAN145(Bom)

..... the resultant assessment a nullity nor that the phrase 'so far as may be' in section 148 has to be universally applied without having any regard to the context in which a given provision of the income tax act has to be applied to the reassessment proceedings. keeping the aforesaid in view, we now proceed to consider the ..... 243 itr 89 . 4. transfer fees - mutuality concept (a) walkeshwar triveni co-op. hsg. soc. ltd. v. cit (sb-mum)(b) cit v. apsara co-op. housing society ltd. : [1993]204itr662(cal) (c) cit v. adarsh co-op. housing society ltd. : [1995]213itr677(guj) (d) cit v. presidency co-op. housing society, ltd. : [1995]216itr321(bom) (e) sagar ..... ]169itr732(ap) (f) sports club of gujarat v. cit : [1988]171itr504(guj) (g) cit v. ranchi club ltd., 196 itr 37 (h) cit v. bombay oilseeds & oil exchange ltd. : [1993]202itr198(bom) (i) cit v. ceivent allocation & coordination org. : [1999]236itr553(bom) (j) cit v. royal western india turf club ltd. : [1953]24itr551(sc) (k) cit v. bankipur club .....