Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 22 the planning board Sorted by: old Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 1 of about 5 results (0.180 seconds)

Dr. Sunil Kumar Vyas Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Nct of Delhi, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the apex body to regulate education in indian medicine, vide order dated 09.05.1991, in order to maintain parity in the teaching posts recommended by the university grants commission (ugc). the aandu tibbia college changed the nomenclature and re-designated the post of demonstrator as lecturer of all incumbents working as demonstrators, re-designating ..... of delhi. one post of demonstrator still exists in the institution, for which continuation of post is still obtained from the competent authority. according to the tibbia college act, 1952, the posts of reader, sr. lecturer grade-i, jr. lecturer and demonstrator were in existence. in 1985, the posts of sr. lecturer grade-i ..... appointed on the post of demonstrator, and he is still continuing on the post of demonstrator. however, it has been admitted that according to the tibbia college act, 1952, the posts of reader, senior lecturer grade-i, junior lecturer and demonstrator were in existence, and that in the year 1985 the posts of senior .....

Yatendra Singh Jafa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ185CAT

..... it is true that the applicant had, apprehending departmental action, moved this tribunal in o.a.-1430/-93, when an interim order was issued on 9.9.1993 directing the respondents "not to resort to any action under article 31 l(2)of the constitution without initiating regular disciplinary action in accordance with law." the ..... and a quantity of arms and ammunition were recovered, complaints about a few irregularities committed surfaced leading to the setting up of a scoi under the bsf act and rules. in the inquiry, the inquiry officer had made certain adverse references among others to the applicant. proceedings proposed to be taken thereafter against the ..... court in the case of kishan mohan behra (supra) relied upon by the respondents was irrelevant, the circumstances being different. the applicant not having committed any act prejudicial to the security of the state, the impugned order was faulty. president's satisfaction was open to judicial review and the respondents attempt to interpret .....

Prem Chand and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(2)SLJ1CAT

..... project. the division bench of the high court has misread this document. the letter dated 9.11.1990 addressed to the vice-chancellor of agricultural university seeking names of the candidates for recruitment to the post of assistant project manager (group 3) itself shows that twenty-five posts of assistant project ..... identify which amongst applicants would fall within the definition of casual labourers as provided in the casual labour (grant of temporary status and regularisation) scheme, 1993. to them and them alone, respondents should extend the benefits of the aforesaid scheme provided, firstly they have been engaged by respondents for a period ..... within a welfare society. 23. the second case (jacob) arose from kerala. upon the establishment of kerala water authority under kerala water supply and sewerage act, 1986, all the functions of public health engineering department were also transferred to the authority. after its constitution the authority too recruited some persons. with .....

Shri M.R. Satyarthy Son of Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... often is to refer the question or the case to a larger bench. 2006 (2) sct 686 single bench munish kumar talwar v. the vice chancellor, baba farid university of health sciences, faridkot, para 13, wherein it has been observed that as long as specific judgment on the subject is applicable to the facts of the case, the ..... said judgment.k.t. veerappa and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. holding that once the benefit of revision of pay scale is given by state or university to its officers and employees in terms of courts order, other employees identically placed would also be given the same benefits.u.p. gram panchayat adhikari sangh and ors. ..... respondent solely relying on or on the basis of the decision in pritam singh. in pritam singh case indisputably the question as regards non-applicability of the 1972 act and consequent applicability of the 1993 rules had not arisen for consideration. the controlling authority in pritam singh case proceeded on the basis that the provisions of the 1972 .....

Tushar Ranjan Mohanty S/O Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... constitution of india. 31. it is not in dispute that a cut-off date can be provided in terms of the provisions of the statute or executive order. in university grants commission v. sadhana chaudhary and ors. (1996) 10 scc 536. it has been observed: 21. it is settled law that the choice of a date as ..... effect per se does not amount to violation of article 14 of the constitution. the legislature can change, as observed by this court in cauvery water disputes tribunal, re (1993 supp. (1) scc 96 (ii)), the basis on which a decision is given by the court and thus change the law in general, which will affect a ..... suppl.) scc 1 rendering ineffective of judgments or orders of competent courts or tribunals by changing their basis by legislative enactment is a well known pattern of all validating acts. such validating legislation which removes the causes for ineffectiveness or invalidity of actions or proceedings is not an encroachment on judicial power. there is a distinction between encroachment .....

Dr. Digambar Behera Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... 5.1 in order to fill up the post of director, a circular was issued on 27.12.2010 for inviting nominations from vice chancellors of indian universities (including medical universities), directors of centres/institutions of medical education/medical research, members of the institute body of pgimer, chandigarh and principals of all the medical colleges in india. ..... . besides, the apex courts decision in anzar ahmed vs state of bihar and ors along with mr. abid asghar vs state of bihar and ors {slr 1993 (5) 798} has also been adverted to. in this case it was held by the honble apex court that the principles governing the allocation of marks ..... objective assessment of the merit of the candidates merits serious consideration. (d) the contention of the applicants learned counsel about there being no provisions in the act, rules or regulations for such a sub-delegation can be matched with the counter contention of there also not being any provision expressly barring evolving of such .....