Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 22 the planning board Sorted by: old Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 5 results (0.193 seconds)

Balwinder Singh and ors. Vs. University of Jammu and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1983J& K19

..... no explanation was sought from them. the petitioners challenged the aforesaid notice through the present writ petition, but before the court could give its decision, the university passed another notification on 28-10-1981, imposing punishment on them. no witness during the enquiry was examined in their presence, nor were the petitioners allowed ..... read consistently with the principles of natural justice, the courts should do so because it must be presumed that the legislatures and the statutory authorities intend to act in accordance with the principles of natural justice. but, if on the other hand, a statutory provision either specifically or by necessary implication excludes the ..... the nature of the accusation made; secondly that he should bo given an opportunity to state his case; and thirdly, of course, that the tribunal should act in good faith. i do not think that there really is anything more.'14. these observations make it abundantly clear that apart from the three requirements : .....

Dr. Mohammad Afzal Khan Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2002J& K36

..... party to the writ.7. the two authorities cited by petition-ers-counsel viz.. marathwada university v. seshrao balwant rao chavan (1989] 3 scc 132 : (air 1989 sc 1582) and naseem bano v. state of u.p., 1993 supp (4) scc 46 : (air 1993 sc 2592) are not applicable to this case. the facts and circumstance of these ..... to grant permission shall also be deemed under law to have the power to add, amend/ alter or rescind it. to say that the authority under the act after giving the permission becomes functus officio. irrespective of imperativeness and requirement of a given situation meriting immediate remedial measures and that too in the present day environment ..... said permission order. the said d.n. kaul was therefore, asked to submit fresh proposal which was processed and considered and after following due procedure under the act and regulation, a decision was taken thereto in december, 1998. it is found that no orders whatsoever have been issued or communicated to concerned including the said d .....

Atal Bihari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(1)JKJ53

..... and again, some of the learned judges continue to betray that tendency. only recently while disposing of appeals arising out of slp nos. 10065-66 of 1993, aligrah muslim university v. vinay engineering enterprises (p) ltd., this court observed:we are surprised, not a little, that the high court of calcutta should have exercised ..... post-confirmation statutory petition against the findings, sentence and order of a summary security force court. it is only section 118 of the border security force act, which contemplates power of annulment of proceedings of any security force court including a summary security force court. that being the case, the principle of merger ..... not be maintainable. in support of their contentions, the respondents say that the petitioner had committed the offence under section 46 of the border security force act at govindpur, raiganj (west bengal), and the orders impugned in the writ petition had been passed/issued by the respondents outside the jurisdiction of the court .....

institute of Dental Sciences Sehora Vs. University of Jammu and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... government of india, accordingly, vide letter dated 28th september, 2006 conveyed formal permission to the trust under section 10-a (4) of the dentists (amendment) act, 1993 to establish a new dental college, under name and style of institute of dental sciences with intake capacity of one hundred students, at sehora, jammu, for the ..... aspirants for available seats had qualified from a single board. according to learned counsel even where the qualifying examination is passed through more than one boards/universities, the requirement of competitive entrance examination is only optional and not compulsory. the framers of the regulations, it is pointed out, have identified institutions of ..... court and superior courts of the country. we may begin with the following observations made by the apex court in guru nanak dev university vs parminder kr bansal and another (1993) 4 scc 40.(air 199.sc 2412). we are afraid that this kind of administration of interlocutory remedies, more guided by sympathy .....

institute of Dental Sciences Sehora Vs. University of Jammu and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... government of india, accordingly, vide letter dated 28th september, 2006 conveyed formal permission to the trust under section 10-a (4) of the dentists (amendment) act, 1993 to establish a new dental college, under name and style of institute of dental sciences with intake capacity of one hundred students, at sehora, jammu, for the ..... aspirants for available seats had qualified from a single board. according to learned counsel even where the qualifying examination is passed through more than one boards/universities, the requirement of competitive entrance examination is only optional and not compulsory. the framers of the regulations, it is pointed out, have identified institutions of ..... court and superior courts of the country. we may begin with the following observations made by the apex court in guru nanak dev university vs parminder kr bansal and another (1993) 4 scc 40.(air 199.sc 2412). we are afraid that this kind of administration of interlocutory remedies, more guided by sympathy .....