Testimony - Judgment Search Results
The Evidence of the Plaintiff in a Suit for Specific Vs. Jagjit Kaur
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
CORUM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.F.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J The evidence of the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell was closed on 06.03.2013
Testimony of Pw-3 Navdeep Gupta Cannot Be Relied Upon Vs. Gurdev Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court Rs.No.1751 of 2009 (O&M) 7 testimony of PW-3 Navdeep Gupta cannot be relied upon in view of the fact that he failed to compare
“parties Are Yet to Lead Evidence to Prove their Respective Pleas. V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
till decision of the suit. Operative part of the order reads as follows:- “Parties are yet to lead evidence to prove their respective pleas. Relevancy of any document cannot be challenged at this stage. In the interest
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Whether in the Present Case the Evidence Adduced by the Vs. Anil Kumar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-23-2014
Appeal, the appellant has claimed the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether in the present case the evidence adduced by the Special Power of Attorney relating to the personal knowledge of the defendant is admissible in
from the Evidence Collected During the Trial or in the Enquiry That So ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRR No.271 of 2014 3 from the evidence collected during the trial or in the enquiry that some person, who is not arraigned as an accused
“perusal of Complaint as Well as Testimony of Complainant as (Pw1) M ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-12-2014
order dated 7.5.2013, which, in substance, is as under (Para 5) :- “Perusal of complaint as well as testimony of complainant as (PW1) Mamta reveal that there is no sufficient evidence on the record of the case
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free