Territory - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: territory Page 1 of about 1,033 results (0.021 seconds)Territory Vs. Lockwood
Court: US Supreme Court
holding or exercising any public office or franchise within this territory, " providing also that the defendant shall "answer such petition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhaleel P, Union Territory of Lakshadweep Vs. Union Territory of Laksh ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
constitutional provisions for the recruitment of Sub Inspectors in Union Territory of Lakahdweep. The procedure adopted by the respondents is, therefore,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Territory Of Ladakh Vs. Jammu And Kashmir National Conference
Court: Supreme Court of India
Plough symbol to it for all elections in the Union Territory of Ladakh. Appellant No.2 forwarded the said representation to Appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Union Territory of Pondicherry, Represented by the Chief Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1976)2MLJ297
State of 'Punjab : [1967]3SCR557 , Shama Rao v. Union Territory : [1967]2SCR650 . The Second Gift Tax Officer, Mangalore v.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs (Palestinian Territories) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Secretary of State f ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
do no more than show that the destination country or territory to which he proposes to remove an illegal entrant is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTerritory of Guam Vs. Olsen
Court: US Supreme Court
Territory of Guam v. Olsen - 431 U.S. 195 (1977) U.S.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Territory of Chandigarh and ors. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Basandhi and a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR2003SC3230; JT2003(Suppl1)SC165; 2003(7)SCALE261; (2003)11SCC549; 2004(86)SLJ17(SC); 2004(1)LC212(SC)
expression 'for the time being' as used in the Union Territory of Chandigarh Employees (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Territory, Chandigarh Vs. Krishan Bhandari
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: JT1996(10)SC396; (1997)IILLJ809SC; 1996(8)SCALE52; (1996)11SCC348; [1996]Supp8SCR270
dated May 16, 1980 that was issued by the Union Territory of Chandigarh there was no revision of pay scale for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Territory Administration, Chandigarh and ors. Vs. Mrs. Manju Mat ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
expert body has erroneously equated the posts under the Union Territory Administration, Chandigarh, with the posts under the Government of Punjab
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Territory of Lakshadweep and ors. Vs. Seashells Beach Resort and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
The total number of the applications received by the Union Territory of Lakshadweep for setting up of resorts and stage at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>