Terminable - Judgment Search Results

Ganesh Benzoplast Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies A ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(1)MhLj386

..... suffered by the plaintiff principal main prayer in the suit was for declaration that the termination notice dated 12 07 2006 of the lease agreement dated 14 2 2000 as null .....

Shri Triloki Nath, S/O Late Shri Rai Singh Vs. the Delhi Power Company ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003(1)SLJ89(Delhi)

..... made up by the respondent was sham and illusory the order passed by the respondent terminating the services of the petitioner dated 20 6 2000 cannot thereforee stand the scrutiny of .....

United States Vs. Terminal Railroad Ass'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... only absorbing other railroad corporation but in doing a transportation business other than supplying terminal facilities operated to the disadvantage of interstate commerce one of the fundamental purposes of ..... and competing railroad companies it is because of the essential difference between railroad and terminal companies proper differences pointed out by the missouri supreme court in the case .....

United States Vs. Terminal R. Ass'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by the proprietary companies third by eliminating from the present agreement between the terminal company and the proprietary companies any provision which restricts any such company to the ..... companies the combination may however exist and continue as a lawful unification of terminal facilities upon abandoning all operating methods and charges as and for railroad transportation and .....

Railroad Trainmen Vs. Terminal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and picketed peacefully at locations where fec operated including the premises of respondent terminal company a federal district court enjoined picketing of respondent s premises except at ..... douglas with whom mr justice black and mr justice stewart concur dissenting respondent provides terminal facilities for four railroads at jacksonville florida petitioners have a longstanding labor dispute .....

Central Transfer Co. Vs. Terminal R. Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... included three operated by petitioner and two operated and one controlled by the columbia terminals company thereupon the interstate commerce commission instituted a proceeding for an investigation of ..... connecting therewith reasonable proper and equal facilities include not only trackage but all other terminal facilities all of which are brought under jurisdiction of the commission see pennsylvania .....

Brady Vs. Terminal Railroad Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wabash page 303 u s 12 both the wabash and the terminal companies were carriers engaged in interstate commerce while making his ..... the statute the question then is whether the responsibility of the terminal association which brought in the car had ended we think ..... from use and was still in the possession of the terminal association its statutory obligation continued and the question is whether .....

Parden Vs. Terminal R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... brought suit in the federal district court for the southern district of alabama against respondent terminal railway of the alabama state docks department they alleged that the railway was a ..... allowing the state to operate an interstate railroad footnote 14 an employee regulation of respondent terminal railway explicitly recognizes that its employees may have causes of action under the fela providing .....

Moore Vs. Terminal R. Assn. of St. Louis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 360 ringhiser v chesapeake o r co 354 u s 901 mcbride v toledo terminal r co 354 u s 517 gibson v thompson 355 u s 18 honeycutt v ..... s 31 1958 u s supreme court moore v terminal r assn of st louis 358 u s 31 1958 moore v terminal railroad association of st louis no 208 decided october .....

U S Vs. TERMiNAL RAiLROAD ASS'N OF ST LOUiS

Court: US Supreme Court

..... louis 215 u s 595 1910 u s supreme court u s v terminal railroad ass n of st louis 215 u s 595 1910 215 u ..... s 595 united states v terminal railroad association of st louis et al no 597 supreme court of the ..... general and the solicitor general for the united states no appearance for the terminal r r association et al per curiam certificate dismissed on the authority of .....