Telephone - Judgment Search Results

Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees Association and anr. Vs. Mahanagar ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR303; [2002(95)FLR1114]; (2003)ILLJ694Bom

is workman who had joined the services of respondent No. 1 in the departmental canteen at the Andheri Telephone Exchange. The workman was working as a bearer and his duty hours were from 7 a.m. to 5

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Vs. M/S Telephone Cables Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Matched in: Parties Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Vs. M/S Telephone Cables Ltd.

Bombay Telephone Users' Association and others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom194; 1992(3)BomCR139

the duration of a call for which one call unit is charged will dependupon the distance between the telephone exchanges to which the calling and the called telephones are connected as specified by the Telegraph authorities from

The Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees' Association Vs. the Mahanagar ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1989(58)FLR161]; (1995)IIILLJ15Bom

of 1987, the relevant facts are as follows:Prior to coming into existence of the 1st Respondent the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Nigam') on April 1, 1986, all the functions of the 1st

American Telephone and Telegraph Co. Vs. Central Office Telephone, Inc ...

Court: US Supreme Court

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. - 524 U.S. 214 (1998) OCTOBER TERM, 1997 Syllabus AMERICAN

Telephone News System, Inc. Vs. Illinois Bell Telephone

Court: US Supreme Court

TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE - 376 U.S. 782 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM,

Jagrit Mazdoor Union (Regd.) and ors. Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Lt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1989(2)SCALE1455; 1990Supp(1)SCC113; [1989]Supp2SCR329; 1990(1)UJ287(SC)

of these applications under Art. 32 of the Constitution is on behalf of the Delhi Reserve Trained Pool Telephone Operators (RTPTOs) asking for a direction to the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited to treat all the telephone operators

Shree Sai Enterprises Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and the Ld. S ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR390; 2007(4)MhLj469

amount of award as Rs. 5,89,819.00.'2. The Arbitrator has also rejected the counter claim filed by the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (for short, 'MTNL') in Arbitration Petition No. 417/2006 and the petitioner in Arbitration Petition No. 433/2006.

Workmen of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. Indian Telephone Indus ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1967)IILLJ888Kant

Government of Mysore have referred two points of dispute between the workmen and the management of the Indian Telephone Industries, Ltd., Bangalore-16. They are : '(1) Are the workmen of the Indian Telephone Industries, Ltd., Dooravaninagar, Bangalore-16,

Workmen of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. Management of Indian T ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2001KAR1341; (2002)IVLLJ370Kant

authority, namely, the Joint Chief Labour Commissioner, Government of India.3. W.P. 12533/1992 is by the workmen of Indian Telephone Industries (hereinafter referred to as ITI in brevity), wherein the prayer is to quash the order dated August