Telegraphs - Judgment Search Results
Telegraphers Vs. Chicago and N.W. R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1960
Telegraphers v. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. - 362 U.S. 330 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Telegraphers v. Chicago &
Telegraphers Vs. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-1944
Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. - 321 U.S. 342 (1944) U.S. Supreme Court Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency,
Western Telegraph Company Vs. Magnetic Telegraph Company
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1858
Western Telegraph Company v. Magnetic Telegraph Company - 62 U.S. 456 (1858) U.S. Supreme Court Western Telegraph Company v. Magnetic
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Senior Superintendent Telegraph (Traffic) Bhopal Vs. Santosh Kumar Sea ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2010
workmen were enrolled with the District Employment Exchange, Bhopal. On a requisition made by the Sr. Superintendent of Telegraph (Traffic) to the District Employment Exchange, the names of the workmen were sponsored and they were engaged as
Posts and Telegraphs Board and Others Vs. C.S.N. Murthy
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-1992
Reported in: AIR1992SC1368; JT1992(2)SC357; 1992LabIC1410; (1993)IILLJ866SC; 1992(1)SCALE727; (1992)2SCC317; [1992]2SCR338; 1992(3)SLJ16(SC); 1992(1)LC549(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC829
(with whom we are not here concerned) in service. Accepting the recommendations of the committee, the Posts and Telegraphs Board issued a notice on the respondent on 19.10.73 giving him notice of compulsory retirement under fundamental Rule
Telegraph Master (D) and Ors. Vs. F.E. D'Silva and Ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-1996
Reported in: ILR1997KAR994
Protection Act, 1986 were not applicable in the light of the provisions of Section 7B of the Indian Telegraphs Act, which provide for arbitration. It was also urged that the complainant- Respondent No. 1 herein was not
The Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-op Credit Society Depositorsâ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-05-2009
per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The petitioner a third party, which claims to be a depositors forum of the Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-op Credit Society Depositors Forum intends to be impleaded as one of the opposite parties to
Divl. Engg. Telegraph, Katihar Vs. Anil Chamariya
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Nov-05-1993
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. The learned Counsels for the appellant as well as the respondent are present. They were heard. The appeal has been filed against the order dated 11-11-92 passed by the District Forum, Katihar...
Director, Telegraph Traffic and Others Vs. N. Ananda Kumar
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-11-1998
the carbon copy of the said order, the matter was referred for the opinion of the Director of Telegraph Traffic, Hyderabad for filing an appeal in the State Commission and he accordingly sent all the papers to
Divisional Engineer Telegraphs Vs. Sunil Kumar Sinha
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Mar-30-1995
Matched in: Parties Divisional Engineer Telegraphs Vs. Sunil Kumar Sinha
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free