Technology - Judgment Search Results
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Vs. Sterlite Technologies Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2015
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2015HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. ...PETITIONER VERSUS STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT1 This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and
Score Information Technologies Ltd. Vs. Sriyash Technologies Ltd. and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
Undertaking, with whom the State of Uttarakhand had entered into an MOU for providing, facilitating and marketing information technology solutions within the State of Uttarakhand. HILTRON was also nominated as the Information Technology and Communication service provider
Goqii Technologies Private Limited versus Sokrati Technologies Private ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-07-2024
Reported in: [2024]11S.C.R.530
executed between the appellant and Sokrati Technologies Private Limited (“the respondent”). A. FACTUAL MATRIX 3. The appellant, a technology-based wellness venture inter alia providing life style consultancy services, executed the MSA with the respondent, an entity engaged
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Zhuhai Hansen Technology Co Ltd. Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
DELHI CO.PET. No. 333 of 2012 Reserved on: March 7, 2013 Decision on: March 19, 2013 ZHUHAI HANSEN TECHNOLOGY CO LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Manisha Singh and Ms. Ritika Nagpal, Advocates. versus
s.s. Technologies vs.n.g. Technologies Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Delivered on:31. t August, 2017 CO.PET. No.314/2009 & CA No.1441/2017 + S.S. TECHNOLOGIES Through : None versus N.G. TECHNOLOGIES LTD ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Adil Khan, Adv. for Mr.Rishi
Avnet Technology Hong Kong Ltd. Vs.pantel Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
(of Vivek Prakash u/O I R-10(2) CPC) & 14067/2018 (for modification of order dated 14th August, 2018) AVNET TECHNOLOGY HONG KONG LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Tanmay Mehta and Mr. Asit Tiwari, Advs. Versus PANTEL TECHNOLOGIES PVT.
Pidge Technologies Pvt Ltd vs Sliksync Technologies Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2026
Petitioner company is engaged in the business of providing logistic support services to its clients through third party technology enabled logistics platforms.Signed By:HARIOM ARB.P. 390/2026 Page 1 of 73. The Respondent isa company having its registered office
Trilux Technologies Singapore Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Boon Technologies ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-29-2004
Reported in: IV(2004)BC280; [2005]123CompCas551(Mad); 2004(4)CTC12
case are as follows:-The respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners and others who were Directors of M/s.Trilux Technologies Singapore Ltd., at Singapore for alleged offences under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. According
Sahajanand Laser Technology Limited Vs. Sahajanand Technology Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Dec-28-2011
removing the trademark Sahajanand with a logo, bearing No: 902852 in class 7. The applicant is Sahajanand Laser Technology Limited and the respondent the trademark holder is Sahajanand Technology Pvt. Ltd. 2. The respondent filed ORA/141/2008/TM/AMD for
Sahajanand Laser Technology Limited, Ahmedabad Vs. Sahajanand Technolo ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Dec-31-2010
Matched in: Parties Sahajanand Laser Technology Limited, Ahmedabad Vs. Sahajanand Technology Pvt. Ltd., Surat and Another
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free