Tea - Judgment Search Results

Albright Vs. Teas

Court: US Supreme Court

Albright v. Teas - 106 U.S. 613 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Albright v. Teas, 106 U.S. 613 (1883) Albright v. Teas

Tea Auction Ltd. Vs. Grace Hill Tea Industry and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC67; 2006(6)ALD76(SC); 2007(1)ALT6(SC); 2006(4)AWC3915(SC); 2007(1)CTC81; JT2006(12)SC9; (2006)4MLJ1688(SC); RLW2007(1)SC490; 2006(9)SCALE223

sum of Rs. 37,26,428/- along with interest, was passed against defendant No. 1.3. Defendant No. 2 was a tea broker of defendant No. 1. It was impleaded as the guarantor of defendant No. 1. No decree, however,

Ms Sms Tea Estates P.Ltd. Vs. Ms Chandmari Tea Co.P.Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

2.1) On 7.10.2006 the appellant requested the respondent to grant a long term lease in respect of two Tea estates (Chandmari Tea Estate and Burahapahar Tea Estate). A lease deed dated 21.12.2006 was executed between the respondent

Abhijit Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Terai Tea Co. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(1)ALD(Cri)745; (1996)1CALLT56(SC); 1996CriLJ895; JT1995(8)SC90; 1995(6)SCALE250; (1996)1SCC589; [1995]Supp4SCR825

ORDERK. Ramaswamy and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.1. The petitioner herein is M/s. Abhijit Tea Co. (P) Ltd. and the respondents are (1) Registrar (Original Side), Calcutta High Court, (2) M/s. The New

Tea Trading Corporation of India Ltd. ors. Vs. Pashok Tea Co. Ltd. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1981(3)SCALE1166; (1981)4SCC113; 1981(13)LC714(SC)

exercise of the powers conferred on it by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 16E of the Tea Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the Tea Trading Corporation of India Ltd. (for short, the

Tea Board,rep.by Jt.Controller of Licens Vs. Tea Tec Exports

Court: Kerala

IN WP(C).28152/2005 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28152/2005 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED2410-2008 APPELLANT: ---------- THE TEA BOARD,14, BTM SARANI (BRABOURNE ROAD) P.O. BOX NO. 2172 CALCUTTA700001, REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT CONTROLLER OF LICENSING. BY

New Manas Tea Estate (P.) Ltd. Vs. Bargaon Tea Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court: Guwahati

Matched in: Parties New Manas Tea Estate (P.) Ltd. Vs. Bargaon Tea Co. (P.) Ltd.

Maheshpur Tea and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mantala Tea Co. Ltd. and or ...

Court: Guwahati

of the learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Title Appeal No. 15/96. 2. On 13.5.1977 M/s Mantala Tea Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) filed Title Suit No.49/77 in the Court of the learned

Tata Tea Limited (Bombay) Employees' Union Vs. Tata Tea Limited and An ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)ALLMR166; 2007(6)BomCR491; [2007(115)FLR1026]; (2008)ILLJ167Bom; 2008(1)MhLj328

that the existing terms and conditions not altered by the settlement would remain unaffected by it.7. Thereafter, Tata Tea Limited, Respondent No. 1 herein, took over James Finlay & Co. The service conditions of the workmen remained

Tata Tea Limited Vs. Suruchi Tea Company and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)BomCR252; 2004(28)PTC83(Bom)

the rules framed under theAct. The respondent had applied for the registration of his trade mark in relationto tea, which has been allowed by the impugned order.2. On 20th October, 1989 the respondent applied to the competent