Tax - Judgment Search Results

Cit Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2010]186TAXMAN186(Bom)

the applications made by the Ajmera Group of firms and their partners under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act for settlement of the tax liability for the assessment years 1989-90 to 1993-94. Ajmera Group consisted of

Petro It Limited vs.petro It Solutions Private Limited

Court: Delhi

order shall not be construed as an order granting exemption, inter alia, from, payment of stamp duty or, taxes or, any other charges, if, payable, as per the relevant provisions of law or, from any applicable permissions

income-tax Officer Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court: Patna

possession of those high denomination notes. Relying upon a decision of this court in Lakshmi Rice Mills v. CIT : [1974]97ITR258(Patna) , the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the addition of Rs. 1 lakh in the

income-tax Officer Vs. President, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and an ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1998]232ITR420(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties income-tax Officer Vs. President, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

income-tax Officer Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1987]168ITR809(Raj)

to the income for the assessment year 1978-79. Respondent No. 2 preferred an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Jodhpur, who dismissed the appeal filed by respondent No. 2. Thereafter, respondent No. 2 preferred an appeal before

The Sales Tax Officer and ors. Vs. the Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1975Delhi357; [1976]37STC356(Delhi)

'any law of a State shall, in so far as it imposes, or authorises the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of goods declared by Parliament by law to be of special importance in

income-tax Officer, A-ward, Dehra Dun, and Another Vs. Income-tax Appe ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1965]58ITR634(All)

in appeal, nevertheless that would not be a material fact or circumstance as the ultimate difference in the tax leviable when computed would only have been a negligible amount. That is neither here nor there for determining

it Cube Inc. and Anil Anand Vs. It Cube India Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2004)121CompCas671

1 having his office at Mahalakshmi Chambers, 3^rd Floor, 22 Bhulabari Desai Road. Bombay-26.2. The respondent company, namely IT Cubes India Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on 5^th July, 2000 with limited liability under the provisions of C.A.

income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Special Bench, Hyderabad Vs. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1996]218ITR275(SC); JT1996(1)SC416; 1996(1)SCALE432; (1996)7SCC454; [1996]1SCR630

heard finally and are being disposed of by this common judgment. These appeals are taken out by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (referred to as 'the Appellate Tribunal') which is up in arms against the Income Tax Department,

income Tax Officer, Azamgarh and anr. Vs. Mewalal Dwarka Prasad

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1989)76CTR(SC)40; [1989]176ITR529(SC); JT1989(1)SC239; (1989)2SCC279; [1989]1SCR604

the assessee challenging the notices issued under Section 148 read with ss. 142(1) and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, all dated 7th of March, 1973 relating to the assessment year 1965-66. The notice under