Tariff Value - Judgment Search Results

Jhandhu Vs. Tariff

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1915)17BOMLR44

Dunedin, J.1. One Sukhram was an owner of property and died. He left behind him a lady named Musammat Imirti,...

Tariff Advisory Committee Vs. Hajjan Nanhi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC2324; (1999)1SCC187

insurance premium ranging between 182.75% to 244% of the existing tariff to be paid by the transport operators and also the

Shri Tariff Singh Dabas Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 129(2006)DLT565

the Gaon Sabha is unable to give him the requisite value of agricultural land as was indicated during the impleadment application

Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. Vs. Tariff Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

operation of the tariff laws of the United States and tariff relations of the United States with foreign countries, on request Work, 263 U. S. 435 ; Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U. S. 117 . We conclude that the

Board Trustees of the Port of Kandla Vs. Tariff Authority of Major Por ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2008)1GLR607

India was enjoined to constitute an authority known as the Tariff Authority for Major Ports. Under Section 48 of the Act,

The Tuticorin Salt and Marine Chemicals Ltd., Vs. The Tariff Authority ...

Court: Chennai

per acre per annum and it was placed before the Tariff Authority for Major Ports [TAMP]/first respondent, which is a statutory of the Committee member and he furnished the present market value as on 07.12.2000 @ Rs.42,000/- per acre per annum. The

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Rep. by Its General Manager and Co ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2009(3)KarLJ612; 2008(3)KCCRSN194; 2008(4)AIRKarR77; AIR2008NOC2416; 2008AIHC2768

49A prescribes regarding pilotage etc as a separate class of tariff, while Section 49B, 50A and 50B provide only regarding port-dues