Taking - Judgment Search Results
Give N Take World Association of Members Empowerment Society vs the Di ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-24-2023
THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 4TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 1659 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: GIVE N TAKE WORLD ASSOCIATION OF MEMBERS EMPOWERMENT SOCIETY AGED 38 YEARS ROOM NO. 16/1132, FIRST FLOOR, SHA SHOPPING MALL ,SOUTH
Juju @ Take Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
falsely implicated in the case. Charge sheet has been filed. The applicants are in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they be released on bail. Learned counsel for State and the objector have
Ramachandra Govind Take and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Bom20; (1968)70BOMLR399; 1969CriLJ112; ILR1969Bom552
exception, from pointing out to the jury such facts in the evidence as might justify the jury in taking the view that the accused's case was covered by one or other exception. It is admitted that this
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Works Have Also Been Completed. the Only Issue Now Left out Is Taking ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
necessary development CWP No.11875 of 2011 [2].works have also been completed. The only issue not left out is taking over of the locality, namely, Silver Enclave by the Municipal Council, Kharar. Mr.Namit Kumar, learned counsel for the
Fatehgarh Sahib. We Take Judicial Notice of the Fact That Vs. Ikbal Si ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
village 'Bir Amloh' from municipal limits of Municipal Council, Amloh, District CWP No.7992 of 2013 [2].Fatehgarh Sahib. We take judicial notice of the fact that Municipal Council, Amloh as also some residents of village Bir Amloh, including
Prabhudas Bachhubhai Babaria and ors. Vs. Sulbha W/O Wasudeorao Take a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-10-2005
Reported in: 2005(5)BomCR425; 2005(2)MhLj1058
obligation to report about the sale by him to the Talathi. It was for the revenue authorities to take note of the said sale and to modify the revenue record accordingly. However the documents on record clearly
Sunil Prakash Sharma S/O Late Suraj Prakash Sharma Vs. Central Bank of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-06-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1194; [2007(113)FLR88]; (2007)2LLJ1005All
Matched in: Parties Sunil Prakash Sharma S/O Late Suraj Prakash Sharma Vs. Central Bank of India, a Body Incorporated Under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Under Taking) Act, 1970 Through Its Deputy General Manager and ors.
M/S. Nav Prabhat Enterprises Vs. Shree Ganesh Dyeing and Printing Work ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-19-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALLMR371; 1999(4)BomCR462; 1999(3)MhLj5
It is the case of the applicant that order dated 22nd January, 1999 passed by the Commissioner for Taking Account of this Court, be set aside and it be declared that the said order is illegal., bad-in-law
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free