Take Proceedings - Judgment Search Results

Sou Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

DATED 13/6/16 IN ST NO.268 OF 2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM PETITIONER SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS AS PER THE RESOLUTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 18/09/2017RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA … the report submitted by the prosecution to satisfy himself/herself of the fact that reasonably sufficient steps have been taken by the prosecution to ensure the presence of the accused and that the costs of ensuring the appearance

Sou Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

DATED 14/06/2016 IN ST NO.145 OF 2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM PETITIONER SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS AS PER THE RESOLUTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 18/09/2017 RESPONDENTS:1 STATE OF KERALA … the report submitted by the prosecution to satisfy himself/herself of the fact that reasonably sufficient steps have been taken by the prosecution to ensure the presence of the accused and that the costs of ensuring the appearance

Contempt Proceedings Vs. Kanwar Singh Saini Overruled

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 161(2009)DLT466

ORDERP.K. Bhasin, J.1. A Reference was made to this Court by a Civil Judge for initiation of contempt proceedings against one Kanwar Singh Saini, who was the sole defendant in a Civil Suit for injunction (hereinafter referred … to be placed before a Division Bench since cognizance of 'criminal contempt' of a Subordinate Court could be taken only by a Division Bench as provided under Section 18 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter

Suomoto Proceedings in Flesh Trade Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2008(1)JKJ161

Bashir A. Kirmani, J.1. On 02.05.2006, this Court initiated suomoto proceedings in the matter in following terms:1. For a couple of preceding days, painful reports regarding inducement, and blackmail … on file.Since the State Government has now assigned the investigation of the case to CBI, who have reportedly taken over the job, we feel CBI is a necessary party in the case. We therefore direct arraying CBI

Proceedings Are Deemed to Be Instituted Only on the Vs. State of Punja ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

no gratuity or death cum retirement gratuity is payable to such an employee till the conclusion of such proceedings and passing of final ordeRs.The Explanation further makes clear that criminal Civil Writ Petition No.20986 of 2012 -2-

Banabihari Mohanty (Dr.) Vs. Member, Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1997)ILLJ987Ori; 1996(I)OLR304

Scheduled Tribes Act, 1971, both relating to restriction of appearance of Advocate. It may be of relevance to take note of similar provisions in Section 13 of Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 8 of Conservation of Foreign … Pasayat, J.1. Petitioner calls in question vires of Rule 6(2) of the Orissa Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunals) Rules, 1951 (in short, the 'Rules'), on the ground that it offends fair play and equity.2.

R.S. Ramachandran Vs. Contempt Proceedings Initiated by the Court on I ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1975Delhi868

shall be construed as implying that any other defense which would have been a valid defense in any proceedings for contempt of court has ceased to be available merely by reason of the provisions of this Act.''17(5).Any … namely, of the 3rd and 12th August, 1974. A notice to show cause why action should not be taken against the respondent under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter called 'the Act') in respect of the

Re: Suo Moto Proceedings Against Mr. R. Karuppan, Advocate

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2204; 2001CriLJ2611; 2001(4)SCALE199; (2001)5SCC289; [2001]3SCR750

concealed the fact that copy of the said press note was included in the files of the contempt proceedings initiated against S.K. Sundaram as early as 7.11.2000. Mr. Karuppan admitted before us that he himself appeared in … writ petition Shri R. Karuppan (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') also filed an affidavit.2.Before the matter was taken up for admission, the Registry of this Court received a petition signed by a number of advocates claiming

In Re: Suo Motu Proceedings, Delhi Transport Department

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC140; (1998)9SCC250

Matched in: Parties In Re: Suo Motu Proceedings, Delhi Transport Department

Suo Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

OF 2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, ALUVA THE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION: SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS ON A COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM THE DISTRICT JUDGE, ERNAKULAM REGARDING WRONG COMMITTAL IN SC 771/2015 OF THE ADDITIONAL