Take Proceedings - Law Dictionary Search Results
Take proceedings
Matched in: Term Take proceedings
Taking any other step in the proceeding
Rachappa Gurudappa, Bijapur v. Gurusiddappa Nananiappa, 1989 (1) SCJ 14. The expression 'taking any other steps in the proceedings' must be given a narrow meaning and be confined to taking steps in the proceedings for resolution of
take up
Matched in: Term take up
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Taking cognizance of an offence
200 and the succeeding sections in Chapter XV of the Code of 1973, he is said to have taken cognizance of the offence within the meaning of s. 190(1)(a), Devarapalli Lakshminarayana Reddy v. V. Narayana Reddy, AIR … cognizance of an offence, when on receiving a complaint, the Magistrate applies his mind for the purposes of proceeding under s. 200 and the succeeding sections in Chapter XV of the Code of 1973, he is said
Cognizance
the King, the Supreme Court and its jurisdiction, and many other things. A judge is not bound to take cognizance of current events, however notorious, nor of the law of other countries. See Roscoe's Evidence at Nisi … as the public statutes of the realm, the ancient history of the realm, the order and course of proceedings in Parliament, the privileges of the House of Commons, the existence of war with a foreign state, the
Taking cognizable
Taking cognizable, the expression 'taking cogniz-able' means the Magistrate take cognizance of an offence and not the offenders, Raghubans Dubey v. State of Bihar, (1967) 2 SCR 423: … (5 of 1898), s. 190] Taking cognizance, would mean the action taken by the court for initiating judicial proceedings against the offender in respect of the offence regarding which the complaint is filed, Narayandas Bhagwandas Madhavdas v.
Take cognisance
Matched in: Term Take cognisance
Void and voidable
voidable, when an imperfection or defect can be cured by the act or confirmation of him who could take advantage of it. Thus, while acceptance of rent will make good a voidable lease, it will not affirm … is necessary, law does not take any notice of the same and it can be disregarded in collateral proceeding or otherwise. The other type of void act, e.g., may be transaction against a minor without being represented
Arbitration
agreement to refer disputes to a foreign tribunal, Kirchner v. Gruban, (1909) 1 Ch 413], commences any legal proceedings [including those by counterclaim, Chappell v. North, 1891 (2) QB 225], against any other party to the submission,
Proviso, Trial by
C.L.P. Act, 1852, s. 116, but a defendant seldom tried by proviso, as the better course was to take proceedings under the repealed s. 101 of the (English) C.L.P. Act, 1852; see now R.S.C. Ord. XXVII.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free