Take Evidence - Judgment Search Results
The Evidence of the Plaintiff in a Suit for Specific Vs. Jagjit Kaur
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
CORUM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.F.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J The evidence of the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell was closed on 06.03.2013
from the Evidence Collected During the Trial or in the Enquiry That So ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRR No.271 of 2014 3 from the evidence collected during the trial or in the enquiry that some person, who is not arraigned as an accused … compelling reasons exist for taking cognizance against the persons and try him against whom action has not been taken earlier. The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Tejwant Kaur Vs. State of Punjab 2004(2) RCR (Crl.)
“parties Are Yet to Lead Evidence to Prove their Respective Pleas. V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
till decision of the suit. Operative part of the order reads as follows:- “Parties are yet to lead evidence to prove their respective pleas. Relevancy of any document cannot be challenged at this stage. In the interest
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Whether in the Present Case the Evidence Adduced by the Vs. Anil Kumar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-23-2014
Appeal, the appellant has claimed the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether in the present case the evidence adduced by the Special Power of Attorney relating to the personal knowledge of the defendant is admissible in
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free