T V Sarma - Judgment Search Results
T.V. Sarma Vs. R. Meeriah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1980
Reported in: AIR1980AP219
9. Regarding A-4 and A-6 he held that as the Division Bench had held in K. Benjamin v. T. V. Sarma, (1977) 2 APLJ 239: (1978 Cri LJ NOC 34) a charge has to be framed against them under … to suicide. We have no hesitation in agreeing with the decision of this court in K. Benjamin v. T. V. Sarma, (1977) 2 APLJ 239: (1978 Cri LJ NOC 34) (supra) that such a conspiracy, especially in which police
T.V. Sarma Vs. Smt. Turgakamala Devi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1975
Reported in: 1976CriLJ1247
Matched in: Parties T.V. Sarma Vs. Smt. Turgakamala Devi and ors.
T.V. Sarma Vs. Achuthuni Nagakoteswararao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-19-1976
Reported in: 1977CriLJ19
bail to all the accused under his order dated 10-2-1976.3. Sri T.V. Sarma, the petitioner herein raised only one contention and that is in regard … ORDERMadhusudan Rao, J.1. This Miscellaneous Petition under Section 439(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is for cancellation of the bail granted to the … an Additional Sessions Judge has no jurisdiction to dispose of an application for bail except when he is validly invested with such jurisdiction by the Sessions Judge under the circumstances mentioned in Section 10(3) of the Code
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Vs. T.V. Sarma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1970
Reported in: AIR1972AP96
Matched in: Parties Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Vs. T.V. Sarma
Budaraju Seshagiri Rao and ors. Vs. T.V. Sarma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-16-1975
Reported in: 1976CriLJ902
accused in the chargesheet filed by the Crime Branch of the CID. Late Dr. Krishna Rao's father, Sri T. V. Sarma, an advocate was dissatisfied with the police charge-sheet. Therefore, he filed a complaint before the Additional Munsif Magistrate … was made out against the petitioners and, therefore, the .Magistrate should not have issued process to them Sri T. V. Sarma, the complainant, appeared in person and raised a preliminary objection that the provisions of Section 397(2) were a
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free