Sum Certain - Judgment Search Results
Sum College of Teacher Education vs National Council for Teacher Educa ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-13-2021
THOMAS MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 22ND BHADRA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 18334 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: SUM COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION MAMBA, P.O. MUZHAPPALA, KANNUR DISTRICT 670 611, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY CUM CORRESPONDENT T.P.
G.Sum Vs. the National Insurance Company Limited,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2541 of 2013 Dated 15-7-2013 G.Sumathi..Petitioner. The National Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Alibag Street, Post Box No.385, Vijayawada. ...Respondent. Counsel for...
“a Sum of `25 000/- Has Been Paid by Petitioner to Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
counsel for the parties have been heard. On 11.9.2013, the following order was passed by this Court: “A sum of `25,000/- has been paid by petitioner to respondent no.2 as per order dated 30.08.2013 of this Court.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sum. Prasad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Federation of Co-operative Spinni ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD741; 2001(6)ALT233
Matched in: Parties Sum. Prasad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Federation of Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd., Hyd. and ors.
Cheung Sum Shee Vs. Nagle
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-25-1925
Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle - 268 U.S. 336 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle, 268 U.S. … minor children of resident Chinese merchants were guaranteed the right of entry by the treaty of 1880, and certainly possessed it prior to July 1st, when the present Immigration Act became effective. United States v. Mrs. Gue
Nasir Khan S/O. Fathe Khan Pathan vs Sum Sangeeta D/O. Gangaram Kokare
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
Matched in: Parties Nasir Khan S/O. Fathe Khan Pathan vs Sum Sangeeta D/O. Gangaram Kokare
M.M. Lal Vs. Sum Balbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-1976
Reported in: 12(1976)DLT365; 1977RLR62
the applicability of sub-section(l)has not been fulfillled. For, it is after the fulfillment of the said condition that certain further complications may arise. Sub-section (4) has been enacted to provide for meeting such complications. It is difficult
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free