Sugarcane - Judgment Search Results
Dewan Sugars Ltd. Through Its General Manager (Sugarcane) Vs. Appellat ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-23-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)AWC2320
question in favour of respondent No. 3. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has shortage of sugarcane and considering the same, the Cane Commissioner had assigned the three centres in favour of the petitioner Mill,
Sugarcane G and S Sugars Shareholders Assocn. Vs. T.N. Pollution Contr ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-15-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC2614; JT1998(2)SC671; 1998(1)LC705(SC)
Matched in: Parties Sugarcane G and S Sugars Shareholders Assocn. Vs. T.N. Pollution Control Board and ors.
Jagatsinghpur Sugarcane Growers, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-06-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Ori150; 99(2005)CLT617
L. Mohapatra, J.1. Sugarcane growers of different places have filed the aforesaid Writ Applications for a declaration that Para-C of Sub-clause (1)
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Thungabhadra Sugarcane and Banana Growers Association and Others Vs. t ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-15-2011
portion of which reads as under: As it involves interpretation of Clause 3, 3A and 6 of the Sugarcane Control Orders 1966, in the background of the observations made by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case
Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders' Association Vs. Sakt ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-1995
Reported in: [1998]93CompCas646(Mad); (1995)IIMLJ469
a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, claiming to represent the interests of 16,000 cane-growers who supply sugarcane to the respondent for crushing and conversion, one-sixth of whom were also shareholders of the respondent and that
Sugarcane Growers and Sakthi Sugars Shareholders' Association, represe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-1995
Reported in: (1995)2MLJ469
society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, claiming to represent the interests of 16,000 cane growers who supply sugarcane to the respondent for crushing and conversion. l/6th of whom were also shareholders of the respondent and that
Anagha Sugarcane Transport Pvt. Vs. Cc and Ce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: May-12-2006
Reported in: (2007)8STJ467CESTAT(Bang.)alore
Matched in: Parties Anagha Sugarcane Transport Pvt. Vs. Cc and Ce
Raju Rajaipure Vs. the Sugarcane Commissioner
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
Matched in: Parties Raju Rajaipure Vs. the Sugarcane Commissioner
Gobind Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Sugarcane (Additional) Price Fixation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-1976
Reported in: ILR1977Delhi259
V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) This and the connected writ petitions challenge the validity of orders passed by the Sugarcane (Additional) Price Fixation Authority and the orders passed by the Central Government upholding these orders. Both the sets
Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Sugarcane (Additional) Price Fix ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-1971
Reported in: AIR1971Delhi285
V.S. Deshpande, J.1. Acting under clause 5 and the Schedule of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, the Sugarcane (Additional) Price Fixation Authority (Respondent No. 1) passed an order on 29th March
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free