Such As - Judgment Search Results
Such a Responsibility Was Cast on Him. in Case there Is a Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
CWP No.1925 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1925 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:01. 02.2013 P.K. Trikha ...... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana & others ........
as Such Without Expressing Any Opinion on the Merits of the Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-21178 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2014. Partap Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.Y.S.Rathore, Advocate...
The Non-such Tea Estates Ltd. Vs. Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-10-1999
Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC214
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 218/90 dated 22.1.91.Appellants claim to have received the order on 11.4.91 and filed this appeal on 24.7.91. There was marginal delay of 14 days in filing the appeal.2. After...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Most Afso Eligible for Such Promotion Under the Rules. a Vs. Central A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11971 of 2013 Date of Decision : May 29, 2013 Union Territory, Chandigarh and another .....Petitioners versus Central Administrative Tribunal and another .....Respondents...
to All Available Sources of Information Such Vs. State of Haryana and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
CWP No.22593 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22593 of 2012 Date of decision:16. 11.2012 Raj Pal ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & ors......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG...
“8. Now It Has to Be Seen Whether Any Such Vs. State of Punjab and A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-39434 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.02.2014. Balwinder Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
May Have to Be Introduced to Support Such Prayers. This Would Naturall ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1319 of 2014 Date of Decision: 21.2.2014 Rajbir Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Sher Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present...
is No Reason for This Court to Issue Any Such Direction as Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 Date of decision:21.02.2014 Savinder Nischal ..Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER...
Counsel Would Argue That in the Totality of Such Circumstances Vs. U.T ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-10220 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2014. Alka @ Seema --Petitioner Versus U.T of Chandigarh & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA....
“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
CRM No.M-5853 of 2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-5853 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:21. 4.2014 Harpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free