Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Such As - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 2013

Such a Responsibility Was Cast on Him. in Case there Is a Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

CWP No.1925 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1925 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:01. 02.2013 P.K. Trikha ...... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana & others ........


Jul 09 2014

as Such Without Expressing Any Opinion on the Merits of the Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-21178 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2014. Partap Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.Y.S.Rathore, Advocate...


Mar 10 1999

The Non-such Tea Estates Ltd. Vs. Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-10-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC214

1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 218/90 dated 22.1.91.Appellants claim to have received the order on 11.4.91 and filed this appeal on 24.7.91. There was marginal delay of 14 days in filing the appeal.2. After...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2013

Most Afso Eligible for Such Promotion Under the Rules. a Vs. Central A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11971 of 2013 Date of Decision : May 29, 2013 Union Territory, Chandigarh and another .....Petitioners versus Central Administrative Tribunal and another .....Respondents...


Nov 16 2012

to All Available Sources of Information Such Vs. State of Haryana and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-16-2012

CWP No.22593 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22593 of 2012 Date of decision:16. 11.2012 Raj Pal ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & ors......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG...


Feb 11 2014

“8. Now It Has to Be Seen Whether Any Such Vs. State of Punjab and A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-11-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-39434 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.02.2014. Balwinder Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...


Feb 21 2014

May Have to Be Introduced to Support Such Prayers. This Would Naturall ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-21-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1319 of 2014 Date of Decision: 21.2.2014 Rajbir Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Sher Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present...


Feb 21 2014

is No Reason for This Court to Issue Any Such Direction as Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-21-2014

CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 Date of decision:21.02.2014 Savinder Nischal ..Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER...


Mar 28 2014

Counsel Would Argue That in the Totality of Such Circumstances Vs. U.T ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-28-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-10220 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2014. Alka @ Seema --Petitioner Versus U.T of Chandigarh & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA....


Apr 21 2014

“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-21-2014

CRM No.M-5853 of 2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-5853 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:21. 4.2014 Harpreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial