Substitution - Judgment Search Results
Prabhat Chandra Roy (Deceased) Substituted by Patroleka Roy and ors. V ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-27-2000
and some other parties died during the pendency of the instant LPA and their heirs/legal representatives have been substituted on record, which is depicted in the genealogical table, set out in the foregoing paragraph.It appears that plaintiff
Ramchandra Wahiwatdar Substituted by Moreshwar Vs. Narayan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-26-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC3286; [2004(1)JCR24(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl1)SC136; 2004(1)MhLj339; 2003(7)SCALE7; (2003)10SCC685; 2004(1)LC244(SC)
Shah, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 8.10.1987 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Second Appeal No. 112/80, the plaintiff - appellant has tiled this appeal.2. At the time of hearing of...
Sarifa Devi (Substituted) and ors. Vs. Anna Khatoon and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-12-2006
of fact by the lower appellate Court are based on evidence, the High Court in second appeal cannot substitute its own findings on reappreciation of evidence merely on the ground that another view was possible.26. We, therefore,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Substituted Mode of Service Cannot Be Adopted. the Issue Is Vs. M/S Ca ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No.1480 of 2013 (O & M) -5- substituted mode of service cannot be adopted. The issue is decided accordingly. Regarding second issue, from the perusal of
Raj Kishore (Substituted) Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-27-1999
Narayan Roy, J.1. Heard Mr. D.N. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.N. Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2.2. An order passed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred...
R. Viswanathan Vs. R. Narayanaswamy Substituted by V.R. Ranganathan an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-23-1971
Reported in: AIR1972SC414; (1972)4SCC822; 1972(4)LC254(SC)
1. This appeal, by special leave, is directed against that part of the judgment and order dated February 3, 1965 of the High Court of Mysore, dismissing I.A. No. 20 in R.A. No. 109 of 1947-48,...
Shibu Micheal vs **Adheela Abdulla**(Substituted)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-08-2023
COCHIN-682001 *SUBSTITUTED RESPONDENT - VISHNU RAJ, OFFICE, K.B. JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, COCHIN - 682 001. (RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS PER ORDER DATED 11.10.2022 IN IA 1/22 IN COC 1417/2022) SRI.ASWIN SETHUKUMAR, SR.GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT
Unninarayanan V. K. vs Sanjeev Kaushik(Substituted)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-30-2021
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. * RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 IS SUBSTITUTED AS THE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DATED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.RAJI T BHASKAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL)
Binu Mathew Chacko vs Mohammed Sabir (Substituted)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-18-2020
NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR(LR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM-682 011. THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS RANI P.ELDHO, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR (LR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,
Mostt. Sharda Devi and anr. Vs. Chandbala Devi (Substituted) and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-31-2007
Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J.1. This Second appeal has been preferred by the defendants-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 12-2-1986 passed by Sri Prem Narain Shukla, 3rd Additional District Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Title...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free