Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Substitution - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2000

Prabhat Chandra Roy (Deceased) Substituted by Patroleka Roy and ors. V ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-27-2000

and some other parties died during the pendency of the instant LPA and their heirs/legal representatives have been substituted on record, which is depicted in the genealogical table, set out in the foregoing paragraph.It appears that plaintiff


Aug 26 2003

Ramchandra Wahiwatdar Substituted by Moreshwar Vs. Narayan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-26-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC3286; [2004(1)JCR24(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl1)SC136; 2004(1)MhLj339; 2003(7)SCALE7; (2003)10SCC685; 2004(1)LC244(SC)

Shah, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 8.10.1987 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Second Appeal No. 112/80, the plaintiff - appellant has tiled this appeal.2. At the time of hearing of...


Oct 12 2006

Sarifa Devi (Substituted) and ors. Vs. Anna Khatoon and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Oct-12-2006

of fact by the lower appellate Court are based on evidence, the High Court in second appeal cannot substitute its own findings on reappreciation of evidence merely on the ground that another view was possible.26. We, therefore,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2013

Substituted Mode of Service Cannot Be Adopted. the Issue Is Vs. M/S Ca ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-21-2013

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No.1480 of 2013 (O & M) -5- substituted mode of service cannot be adopted. The issue is decided accordingly. Regarding second issue, from the perusal of


Jul 27 1999

Raj Kishore (Substituted) Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-27-1999

Narayan Roy, J.1. Heard Mr. D.N. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.N. Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2.2. An order passed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred...


Nov 23 1971

R. Viswanathan Vs. R. Narayanaswamy Substituted by V.R. Ranganathan an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-23-1971

Reported in: AIR1972SC414; (1972)4SCC822; 1972(4)LC254(SC)

1. This appeal, by special leave, is directed against that part of the judgment and order dated February 3, 1965 of the High Court of Mysore, dismissing I.A. No. 20 in R.A. No. 109 of 1947-48,...


Sep 08 2023

Shibu Micheal vs **Adheela Abdulla**(Substituted)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-08-2023

COCHIN-682001 *SUBSTITUTED RESPONDENT - VISHNU RAJ, OFFICE, K.B. JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, COCHIN - 682 001. (RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS PER ORDER DATED 11.10.2022 IN IA 1/22 IN COC 1417/2022) SRI.ASWIN SETHUKUMAR, SR.GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT


Mar 30 2021

Unninarayanan V. K. vs Sanjeev Kaushik(Substituted)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-30-2021

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. * RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 IS SUBSTITUTED AS THE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DATED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.RAJI T BHASKAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL)


Nov 18 2020

Binu Mathew Chacko vs Mohammed Sabir (Substituted)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-18-2020

NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR(LR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM-682 011. THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED AS RANI P.ELDHO, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TAHSILDAR (LR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,


May 31 2007

Mostt. Sharda Devi and anr. Vs. Chandbala Devi (Substituted) and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-31-2007

Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J.1. This Second appeal has been preferred by the defendants-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 12-2-1986 passed by Sri Prem Narain Shukla, 3rd Additional District Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Title...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial