Subsequent - Judgment Search Results

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... australian decisions relied upon by the majority have it was contended been reversed by subsequent pronouncements of the australian high court which pronouncements are now gravitating towards the ..... incurred the constitution bench was restating the working test of automobile transport but the subsequent observations in jindal stainless make it evident that the constitution bench introduced a near .....

V.G. Naidu @ Govindasamy Naidu Vs. Pahlajraj Gangaram @ Pahlaj Rai

Court: Chennai

..... by the erstwhile landlord have to be considered 23 the learned counsel for the subsequent subsequent landlord has relied upon the following decision in support of the proposition that the second ..... understandable as the revision petitioner has acquired expertise in dragging on the proceedings the subsequent purchaser is legally entitled to continue the eviction proceedings as the default in payment of .....

Sachidanandhan Vs. Vijesh and Another

Court: Kerala

Reported in:

Cases Relied:
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom 279].
Vimala Ammal V C. Susheela [AIR 1991 Mad 209].
Dwarka Prasad Singh v. Harikant Prasad Singh [(1973) 1 SCC 179 :. AIR 1973 SC 655].
P.P.S Pillai V Catholic Syrian Bnak [2000(3) KLT 629].
Peter Cherian v. Abraham [2007 (4) KLT 680].
Satheedevi v. Prasanna [2010(2) KLT 642 (SC)].
Ali Rowther v. Kochupennu [1986 KLT 718].
Kali Charanv. Janak Deo [A.I.R. 1932 Allahabad 694].
Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal [A.I.R.1982 S.C.818].
Potter v. Sanders (6 Ha. 1).
Daniels v. Davison (17 Ves 433).
Holmes v. Powell (8 De G.M. and G. 572).
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders and Investors (P) Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC 397.
(Kafiladdin case, AIR p. 68).
R.C. Chandiok v. Chuni Lal Sabharwal:AIR 1971 SC 1238:(1970) 3 SCC 140.
SCR p. 369 in Durga Prasad v. Deep Chand viz.
S.V.R. Mudaliar v. Rajabu F. Buhari, AIR 1995 SC 1607.

Cases Referred:
Bankim Chandra v. Anand Bazar Patrika [AIR (37) 1950 Calcutta 128].
Thanga Pandiyan v. S.R.Periaswami Thevar [1953 KHC 196: 1953 KLT 475, 2015 KHC 90.
Mohandas K. K. and others V Thankamma Pillai [2015 KHC 90].
Durga Prasad and Anr. v. Deep Chand and Ors. [AIR 1954 SC 75].
Appukuttan v. Kamalakshi [1996(2) KLT 977].
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom. 279],
W.P. 6225 of 2007 of Bombay High Court, Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [AIR 2015 Mad 96], 2010(2) KLT 642 (SC).
Krishna Chandra Kabiraj and others V Sankaran Kabiraj and others [AIR 1950 Calcutta 128].
Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [2015 KHC 2237: AIR 2015 Mad 96].
Vigro Industries Pvt Ltd V Venturetech Solutions P Ltd : 2012(5) CTC 359.
State Bank of India V Cracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd : 2013 STPL (Web) 939

Comparative Citation:
2016 (1) KLT 75 (SN) (C.No.79),

..... of agreement of sale recovery of possession and for declaration that the sale deeds executed subsequent to the agreement for sale transferring the properties to other defendants were ineffective as per ..... decree for specific performance can be enforced against a transferee like the 2nd defendant the subsequent transferee by virtue of the provisions contained in section 19 even without a separate .....

Roche Products (India) Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. Drugs Controller Genera ...

Court: Delhi

..... with the jurisdiction to determine bmab 200 s bio similarity comparability to herceptin and to subsequently grant manufacturing and marketing authorizations thereon to defendant no 2 in exercise of its powers ..... form 44 application with appendix i and not appendix i a which states that subsequent approval permission for manufacture of already approved new drug not applicable emphasis supplied 206 it .....

Blue Coast Hotels Limited Vs. IFCI Limited

Court: Mumbai

..... three situations above after the possession is handed over to the secured creditor the subsequent specified provisions of rule 8 concerning the preservation valuation and sale of the secured ..... facts are revolving around the licensor and licensee and landlord and tenant relationship itc being subsequent purchaser but not secured creditors independently also could not have applied for securing the .....

Sudam Chandra Malakar Vs. Arundhuti Sen and Anr.

Court: Kolkata

..... order ii rule 2 would immediately get attracted and therefore the present suit being the subsequent suit is not maintainable in support of the aforesaid contention he relies upon several judgments ..... restraining the defendants therein from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit land subsequently another suit was filed during the pendency of the earlier suit for declaration that the .....

K v Shivakumar Vs. National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro

Court: Karnataka

..... an application for amendment was filed seeking deletion of those paras and it was allowed subsequently the plaint was amended substituting new paragraphs ex d12 in the substituted paras at paragraph ..... an application taking away valuable right of the plaintiff was not challenged before this court subsequently they pleaded title claiming inheritance from chikkada bhovi the defendant no 4 in the said .....

Atul Kapur Vs. Arun Kapur and Others

Court: Chennai

..... 40 this court has already held that the execution of the release deed is subsequently stated in the subsequent documents like sale deeds executed jointly by the plaintiff and the defendants 1 and ..... on 22 04 1999 when the agreement was executed between the plaintiff and defendants and subsequently when the plaintiff demanded partition and separate possession and account of the collections made by .....

Sarasamma Vs. G. Pandurangan and Others

Court: Chennai

..... filed original petition for letters of administration of the alleged will dated 23 06 1999 subsequently on the appearance of the defendant and after following the procedure the said original ..... of the said interim order the defendant demolished the building situated at guduvancherry property and subsequently after filing counter by the plaintiff the said suit was withdrawn by the defendant and .....

Advocates' Forum for Social Justice rep. by its President, Mr. K. Balu ...

Court: Chennai

..... general argued the writ appeal only on the basis of the subsequent government order when it was pointed out by the division bench ..... objective is not in furtherance of what the bar council of india subsequently envisaged i e a hiatus period to reorganize the system where ..... is not in furtherance of what the bar council of india subsequently envisaged i e a hiatus period to reorganize the system where .....