Skip to content


Subsequent - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: subsequent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.105 seconds)
May 28 2002 (TRI)

Purnima Beri Vs. Dy. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on: May-28-2002

Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Asr.)467

..... the assessing officer were the statements of witnesses recorded by the authorised officer which were subsequently resiled by both the witnesses before the assessing officer in fact the assessing officer ..... given an opportunity to cross examine them the learned jm thereafter came to the subsequent statements recorded whereby the witnesses resiled from the earlier statement and relevant extracts from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-19-2002

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)

..... investment allowance hence the legislature provided that investment allowance could be carried forward in the subsequent assessment years when the income is sufficient to take the benefit of the investment ..... there can arise no question of working out any additional investment allowance in such subsequent year in which the fluctuation takes place mr akil qureshi learned standing counsel appearing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 2002 (TRI)

Nb Jaffar Ali Khan Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Sep-20-2002

Reported in: (2003)87ITD359(Hyd.)

..... stage and was accordingly dismissed though this order at the request of the union was subsequently modified and the order finally passed recorded that the application was dismissed as withdrawn ..... ignored irrespective of the impact of the compromise agreement dated 14 2 1989 or the subsequent events 23 5 the learned departmental representative as already mentioned pleaded that the valuation officer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 2002 (HC)

Mrs. R.E. Fanibunda Vs. Nicholas of India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-09-2002

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR967

..... 3 herein something on 16th january 1980 which application was allowed on 5th june 1980 subsequently the petitioner took out another application for adding defendant no 4 respondent no 4 herein ..... commenced and the court is not precluded from moulding the reliefs appropriately in consideration of subsequent events provided such events had an impact on those rights and obligations in the recent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 14 2002 (HC)

Konagandla Saraswathi and ors. Vs. Pulipaty Kumarswamy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-14-2002

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD315; 2002(5)ALT23

..... bearing on the facts of the case taking cognizance of subsequent events depends upon the factual and situational differences characterizing a ..... ground of bonafide requirement of premises by the landlord the subsequent events may be taken into consideration so as to find ..... of the landlord are not disturbed due to any substantial subsequent changes 13 the rent controller is justified in ordering eviction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Syndicate Bank

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-05-2002

Reported in: [2003]127TAXMAN287(Kar)

..... an assessment period on the basis of determination of liability subsequently though relatable to the earlier period just as in the ..... passing of the annual accounts by the managed company the subsequent relinquishment of this right by resolutions of its board by ..... appellate tribunal cannot be permitted to raise the same question subsequently as such legal position had been accepted by the department .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2002 (SC)

Nagpur Improvement Trust Vs. Vasantrao and ors. and Jaswantibai and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC3499; 2002(6)ALD12(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)905; 2003(1)AWC161(SC); JT2002(7)SC447; (2003)1MLJ22(SC); 2002(7)SCALE307; (2002)7SCC657; [2002]SUPP2SCR636

..... is areferential legislation the provisions of theearlier legislation to which reference is madein the subsequent legislation would beapplicable as it stands on the date ofapplication of such earlier legislation ..... soincorporated that is made after the date ofincorporation of such statute does not affectthe subsequent statute in which it isincorporated and the provisions of thestatute which have been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2002 (TRI)

B and Brothers Engineering Works Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Dec-17-2002

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(Ahd.)876

..... m s mahendra suitings for sale of machinery which that party subsequently refused to buy the ao accordingly completed the assessment at ..... with assessee as technical executive from 11th nov 1991 and subsequently as sales marketing executive for last one year prior to ..... view taken by the learned am on both the additions and subsequent arguments advanced by him were a reiteration of those tendered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2002 (TRI)

Network Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-25-2002

Reported in: (2003)84ITD67(Delhi)

..... of underwriting commission and brokerage had also been given in subsequent para and a perusal thereof shall show that all the ..... assessee is justified one because conversion of the debenture is subsequent development and that too after allotment of debenture to each ..... and an applicant when making payment of application money and subsequently the allotment amount was in no doubt that on payment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 2002 (TRI)

Mrs. Purnima Beri Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on: May-28-2002

Reported in: (2002)82ITD137(Asr.)

..... works into m s leader valves ltd the original partners became shareholders of the company subsequently disputes had arisen among the promoters shareholders and the pattern of shareholding was such ..... given an opportunity to cross examine them 26 the learned jm thereafter came to the subsequent statements recorded whereby the witnesses resiled from the earlier statement and relevant extracts from the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //