Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Subsequent - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2008

Regional Director, E.S.i. and anr. Vs. Rahimaniya Sago Factory, by Sub ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-2008

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR116]; (2009)ILLJ344Mad

that originally the factory was in the name of Rahimaniya Sago Factory at Attur owned by P.W. 1. Subsequently, the same was taken on lease in the year 1987, by one Rajamanickam and Co., then in the


May 22 2014

Though Section 11 Has Been Subsequently Amended Vide Act Vs. Gram Panc ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-22-2014

even in respect of such land, there is no evidence to link with the land after consolidation. The subsequent Jamabandi for the year 1951-52 (Annexure P-33).again records possession of Shadi Ram Durga Datt, Atma Ram, Paras Ram,


Jul 18 2014

Complainant. the Argument Is That Subsequently the Complainant Who Is ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-18-2014

the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-21808 of 2014 2 complainant. The argument is that subsequently the complainant, who is real brother of the petitioner, became inimical and has lodged a false complaint in


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2003

Tata Consulting Engineers (Erstwhile Division of Tata Sons Ltd.) Subse ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-08-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)MhLj430

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Rule. By consent, the rule is made returnable forthwith.2. The petitioners challenge the judgment and order dated 24-3-2003, passed by the Industrial Tribunal whereby he Tribunal...


Oct 23 1914

Sri Rajah Vatsavaya Venkata Simhadri Jaghapathiraju Bahadur Garu, Havi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-23-1914

Reported in: (1915)28MLJ51

Government by which an inamdar was entitled to water free of separate charge. If the arrangement is one subsequent to the settlement, I shall be inclined to hold that it governed the relations between the parties even


Oct 28 1914

Sri Rajah Vatasavaya Venkata Simhadri Jaghapathi Raju Bahadur Garu, Dy ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-28-1914

Reported in: (1916)ILR39Mad67

Government by which an inamdar was entitled to water free of separate charge. If the arrangement is one subsequent to the settlement, I should foe inclined to hold that it governed the relations between the parties even


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial