Subsequent - Judgment Search Results

Regional Director, E.S.i. and anr. Vs. Rahimaniya Sago Factory, by Sub ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR116]; (2009)ILLJ344Mad

..... that sri ramajayam sago factory was run by one t krishnasamy subsequently on behalf of sri ramajayam sago factory rs 4 991 had ..... on july 29 1987 as contribution under exhibit a 1 receipt subsequent to 1987 the respondent is paying the contribution under the esi act ..... any arrears or dues payable by the respondent under the esi act subsequent to september 16 1987 in such circumstances the burden is heavily .....

Though Section 11 Has Been Subsequently Amended Vide Act Vs. Gram Panc ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... there is no evidence to link with the land after consolidation the subsequent jamabandi for the year 1951 52 annexure p 33 again records ..... year 1947 48 records possession over 3 bighas of land but the subsequent khasr girdawari again reflects the land as banjar qadim in view ..... the said name sue and be sued though section 11 has been subsequently amended vide act no 25 of 1993 and for the expression .....

Sri Rajah Vatsavaya Venkata Simhadri Jaghapathiraju Bahadur Garu, Havi ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1915)28MLJ51

..... an inamdar was entitled to water free of separate charge if the arrangement is one subsequent to the settlement i shall be inclined to hold that it governed the relations between ..... india v ambalavana pandara sannadhi i l r 1913 m 369 rahim j and myself subsequently followed by miller and rahim jj secretary of state for india in council v perumal .....

Sri Rajah Vatasavaya Venkata Simhadri Jaghapathi Raju Bahadur Garu, Dy ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1916)ILR39Mad67

..... an inamdar was entitled to water free of separate charge if the arrangement is one subsequent to the settlement i should foe inclined to hold that it governed the relations between ..... state v ambalavana pandora sannadhi i l r 1911 mad 366 rahim j and myself subsequently followed by miller and rahim jj secretary of state for india in council v perumal .....

Complainant. the Argument Is That Subsequently the Complainant Who Is ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... this document chandigarh crm no m 21808 of 2014 2 complainant the argument is that subsequently the complainant who is real brother of the petitioner became inimical and has lodged a .....

Tata Consulting Engineers (Erstwhile Division of Tata Sons Ltd.) Subse ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(1)MhLj430

r m s khandeparkar j 1 heard the learned advocates for the parties rule by consent the rule is made...

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. Siddamsetty Ramesh and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Reported in: I(2004)BC111

..... counsel for the appellant bank submits that the 3rd defendant is the subsequent purchaser of the mortgaged property and the 3rd defendant is also ..... hands the counsel for the respondents submits that the mortgage was created subsequent to the purchase by the 3rd defendant and so the 3rd ..... was created on 15 3 95 even when the loan was subsequently enhanced in the year 1997 even at the time of creating .....

Shivakant Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

shivakant tiwari ors versus state ors w p no 19708 2012 26 11 2012 shri vinay pratap singh learned counsel...

Shivkant Dixit Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

shivkant dixit versus state of mp and others 16 10 2012 shri anubhav jain for the petitioner shri sanjeev kumar...

Mrs. Rose Shimray Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... section 14 of the act inasmuch as no fresh facts have been arisen warranting the subsequent detention orders and therefore the detention orders vitiated b the detaining authority considered the grounds ..... the earlier grounds of detention which grounds had been nullified by the high court the subsequent detention order was vitiated on the ground that the detaining authority had taken into consideration .....