Sub Station - Judgment Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Vs. Maroti S/O ...

Court: Mumbai

Confirmation Case No. 2 of 2008 has arisen out of submission of proceeding of said trial to this Court for considering … are as under:API Dipak Gotmare (PW16) attached with Ladkhed Police Station on night patrolling duty on Pola festival day of 14.9.2004

Horticulture Experiment Station Gonikoppal Coorg Vs. The Regional Prov ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

under Section 14B of the Act 1952, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeals.4. The Act 1952 … INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2136 OF2012HORTICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION GONIKOPPAL, COORG ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION ….RESPONDENT(S)

Panki thermal Station and anr. Vs. Vidyut Mazdoor Sangthan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2373; [2009(121)FLR173]; (2009)IILLJ320SC; 2009(3)SCALE290; (2009)11SCC277

by the Commissioner dated 6th August, 1999 which was the subject matter of challenge in writ petition No. 47303 of 1999

All India Station Masters' and Assistant Station Masters' Association, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1960SC384; [1960]2SCR311

same class of employees. In our opinion, there is no substance in this contention. It has to be noticed first that … Das Gupta, J.1. The petitioners who describe themselves as Road-side Station Masters challenge in this petition under Art. 32 of the

Sports Station (India) Pvt Ltd vs.sunil Rai @ Suneil Rai

Court: Delhi

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.3061/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. F.A.O. … NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:22. 01.2019 F.A.O.No.24/2019 SPORTS STATION (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sonal Jain &

Indian Railway Stations Development Corporation Ltd. Vs.pr. Commission ...

Court: Delhi

(iv) feasibility studies was appointed only on 01.02.2013.” It was submitted that until something substantial in regard to the business plan … Decided on:26. h March, 2019. + W.P.(C) 6782/2018 INDIAN RAILWAY STATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava &

Rakesh Filling Station vs.bindresh Kumar Dubey

Court: Delhi

Rs.1,50,000/- is fair and reasonable.5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits on instructions from the respondent present in Court that respondent … 2019 + W.P.(C) 4944/2019 & CM Appl. 22012/2019 RAKESH FILLING STATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary and Mr. Saurab Joon,

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court: Kerala

Police.9. PW6 inspected the lorry involved in the incident and submitted Ext.P5 report. PW7 is the Doctor who treated PWs 2 … HIDAYATH NAGAR, UPPALA.6. FASAL, S/O.HUSSAIN, HUSSAIN NAGAR, NEAR UPPALA RAILWAY STATION. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT AND STATE.: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATION

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court: Kerala

Police.9. PW6 inspected the lorry involved in the incident and submitted Ext.P5 report. PW7 is the Doctor who treated PWs 2 … HIDAYATH NAGAR, UPPALA.6. FASAL, S/O.HUSSAIN, HUSSAIN NAGAR, NEAR UPPALA RAILWAY STATION. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT AND STATE.: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATION

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court: Kerala

Police.9. PW6 inspected the lorry involved in the incident and submitted Ext.P5 report. PW7 is the Doctor who treated PWs 2 … HIDAYATH NAGAR, UPPALA.6. FASAL, S/O.HUSSAIN, HUSSAIN NAGAR, NEAR UPPALA RAILWAY STATION. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT AND STATE.: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATION