Sub Station - Judgment Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Vs. Maroti S/O ...

Court: Mumbai

brief facts giving rise to the said trial are as under:API Dipak Gotmare (PW16) attached with Ladkhed Police Station on night patrolling duty on Pola festival day of 14.9.2004 had received information of quarrel having taken place … Under Section 135 of Bombay Police Act.2. The Confirmation Case No. 2 of 2008 has arisen out of submission of proceeding of said trial to this Court for considering question of confirmation of sentence of death awarded

Horticulture Experiment Station Gonikoppal Coorg Vs. The Regional Prov ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2136 OF2012HORTICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION GONIKOPPAL, COORG ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION ….RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2121 OF2012WITH CIVIL APPEAL … for delay in payment of contribution of EPF under Section 14B of the Act 1952, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeals.4. The Act 1952 is a legislation for providing social security to

Panki thermal Station and anr. Vs. Vidyut Mazdoor Sangthan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2373; [2009(121)FLR173]; (2009)IILLJ320SC; 2009(3)SCALE290; (2009)11SCC277

noted that there were two orders one passed by the Commissioner dated 6th August, 1999 which was the subject matter of challenge in writ petition No. 47303 of 1999 and the other was passed by the Tribunal.

All India Station Masters' and Assistant Station Masters' Association, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1960SC384; [1960]2SCR311

Das Gupta, J.1. The petitioners who describe themselves as Road-side Station Masters challenge in this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution the Constitutionality of the channel of promotion … Masters and Guards really form one and the same class of employees. In our opinion, there is no substance in this contention. It has to be noticed first that Appendix II of the Railway Establishment Code (Vol.

Sports Station (India) Pvt Ltd vs.sunil Rai @ Suneil Rai

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:22. 01.2019 F.A.O.No.24/2019 SPORTS STATION (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sonal Jain & Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocates. Versus SUNIL RAI @ … Versus SUNIL RAI @ SUNEIL RAI ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL C.M. No.3061/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. F.A.O. No.24/2019 & C.M. No.3060/2019 (for stay) 1. The

Indian Railway Stations Development Corporation Ltd. Vs.pr. Commission ...

Court: Delhi

and the first consultant for Architectural and technical (iv) feasibility studies was appointed only on 01.02.2013.” It was submitted that until something substantial in regard to the business plan and development of railway stations actually crystallized, the … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h March, 2019. + W.P.(C) 6782/2018 INDIAN RAILWAY STATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava & Mr. Suvinay Kumar Dash, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER

Rakesh Filling Station vs.bindresh Kumar Dubey

Court: Delhi

AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4944/2019 & CM Appl. 22012/2019 RAKESH FILLING STATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary and Mr. Saurab Joon, Advocates versus BINDRESH KUMAR DUBEY ..... Respondent Through: … that considering the relevant facts, the compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- is fair and reasonable.5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits on instructions from the respondent present in Court that respondent is willing to accept Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation. W.P.(C)

Komalam vs Station House Officer

Court: Kerala

OF 2021 PETITIONER/: KOMALAM AGED 63 YEARS, W/O. GANGADHARAN, MAKKOTH,PUTHUR, MARATHAKKARA, THRISSUR-680 014. BY ADV K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OLLUR POLICE STATION, OLLUR, THRISSUR-680 306. 2 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) THRISSUR-680 009. 3 RAJAN NAMBILATH … Court, Thrissur for permanent prohibitory injunction, and the same was decreed as Ext.P1.3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that evenafter Ext.P1 judgment was passed, respondents 3 to 5 came to the property and attempted to cut

Noushad vs Station House Officer

Court: Kerala

YEARS S/O MOHAMMEDALI, CHAKKINGAPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE KUTTAMANGALAM, EDATHIRUTHY P.O, THRISSUR, PIN - BY ADVS. K.I.SAGEER MUHAMMED YASIL RESPONDENTS: 1 STATION HOUSE OFFICER VALAPPAD POLICE STATION, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR, PIN - 2 SOMAN, (AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) S/O … the petitioner, as made by his learned Counsel Sri.K.I.Sageer, the learned Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent- Sri.K.R.Prathish submitted that, the petitioner is attempting to construct the compound wall in violation of law and in defiance of

Radhamani vs Station House Officer

Court: Kerala

TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683543 BY ADVS. K.R.PRATHISH S.UNNIKRISHNAN (NELLAD) JOEL CHALAMANA KRISHNA DAS P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUNNATHUNADU POLICE STATION, PATTIMATTAM PATTIMATTAM P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683562 2 SHEENA BINOY, /O. BINOY, KOMBANAL