Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Sturtevant V Commonwealth - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 06 1914

Carlesi Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-06-1914

v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673 ; Ross's Case, 2 Pick. 165; Commonwealth v. Graves, 155 Mass. 163; Sturtevant v. Commonwealth, 158 Mass. 598; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 175 Mass. 202." "The statute does not impair the right of trial


Nov 25 1895

Moore Vs. Missouri

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-25-1895

v. People, 55 N.Y. 512; Kelly v. People, 115 Ill. 583; Blackburn v. State, 50 Ohio St. 428; Sturtevant v. Commonwealth, 158 Mass. 598. The reason for holding that the accused is not again punished for the first offense


Feb 25 1901

Mcdonald Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-25-1901

v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673 ; Ross' Case, 2 Pick. 165; Commonwealth v. Graves, 155 Mass. 163; Sturtevant v. Commonwealth, 158 Mass. 598; Commonwealth v. Richardson, 175 Mass. 202. The statute does not impair the right of trial


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 1896

Wilson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-27-1896

where violence has been inflicted is always relevant and admissible in evidence. Whart.Crim. Ev. § 778; Commonwealth v. Sturtevant, 117 Mass. 122. The trial judge left it to the jury, if they found that there were bloodstains, … considered by the jury along with the other facts in the case in arriving at their verdict. Williams v. Commonwealth, 29 Penn.St. 102; State v. McGorty, 114 Mass. 299; Sahlinger v. People, 102 Ill. 241; State v. Raymond,


Apr 15 1911

Wilson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-15-1911

as the representatives of the corporation." See also Leavenworth v. Kinney, 154 U. S. 642 ; People v. Sturtevant, 9 N.Y. 277. The appellant asserts his privilege against self-crimination. There is no question, of course, of oral … State v. Davis, 69 S.E.Rep. (W.Va.) 639; People v. Coombs, 158 N.Y. 532; L. & N. R.R. Co. v. Commonwealth, 51 S.W.Rep. (Ky.) 167; State v. Smith, 74 Iowa, 580; State v. Cummins, 76 Iowa, 133; People v.


Jan 02 1952

RochIn Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-02-1952

murder); Skidmore v. State, 59 Nev. 320, 92 P.2d 979 (examination of accused for venereal disease); State v. Sturtevant, 96 N.H. 99, 70 A.2d 909 (blood test to determine intoxication); State v. Alexander, 7 N.J. 585, 83 … urinalysis to determine intoxication); State v. Cram, 176 Or. 577, 160 P.2d 283 (blood test to determine intoxication); Commonwealth v. Statti, 166 Pa.Super. 577, 73 A.2d 688 (blood typing linking accused to assault). [ Footnote 3/2 ]


Feb 25 1957

Breithaupt Vs. Abram

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-25-1957

were favorable to accused); State v. Cram, 176 Or. 577, 160 P.2d 283 (1945). See also State v. Sturtevant, 96 N.H. 99, 70 A.2d 909 (1950); cf. United States v. Williamson, 4 U.S.C.M.A. 320, 15 C.M.R. 320 … State, 189 Md. 640, 57 A.2d 289 (1948); State v. Alexander, 7 N.J. 585, 83 A.2d 441 (1951); Commonwealth v. Statti, 166 Pa.Super. 577, 73 A.2d 688 (1950). Many States authorize blood tests in civil actions such


Oct 31 2012

M/S. Balaji Silk House Represented by Its Proprietor K.C.S. Setty and ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-31-2012

as occurring in a single complex instrument in which one part may throw light on another” (Vide James v. Commonwealth of Australia, (1936) AC 578 at p.613). In construing Art. 301 we must, therefore, have regard to the


Nov 05 2015

C.B.I Vs. Dharambir Khattar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-05-2015

Papers brought into existence for the purpose of preparing a submission to cabinet (vide Commonwealth Lanyon Property Ltd. v. Commonwealth 129 LR 650) and indeed any documents which relate to the framing of government policy at a high


Apr 04 2016

Alaska Export USA Inc. Vs. Alaska Exports, rep. by its Managing Partne ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Apr-04-2016

decisions: (i) Shakthi Bhog Foods Ltd. v. Kola Shipping Ltd., [2009 (2) SCC 134] (ii) Swiss Timing Ltd., v. Commonwealth Games 2010 Organising Committee [2014 (6) SCC 677] (iii) N.Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers [2010 (1) SCC 72] 9.


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial