Stock Exchange - Judgment Search Results
Delhi Stock Exchange Association Limited Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Kara ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2000
Reported in: 2000(55)DRJ681; [2000(86)FLR705]; (2000)IILLJ436Del
39 Rule 4 CPC) filed in a suit for injunction are being disposed of. 2. Plaintiff is a Stock Exchange duly recognised/licensed under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 having a strength of about 185 employees. Defendant No.
The Madras Stock Exchange Limited Rep. by Its Secretary Vs. S.S.R. Raj ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-2003
Reported in: [2003]116CompCas214(Mad); (2003)4CompLJ50(Mad); [2004]49SCL319(Mad)
the question whether any interim order should issue to continue the appellant as a Member of the defendant Stock Exchange Company. The trial Court has declined to grant the application. In the appeal, however, the appellant has preferred … the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 seeking a declaration that the applicant continued to be Member of the Madras Stock Exchange notwithstanding the order of expulsion which the Committee had made and which had been duly communicated, that order
Calcutta Stock Exchange Vs. M/S Blb Limited
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-11-2015
Non-reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.36711 OF2014Calcutta Stock Exchange … Petitioner Versus BLB Limited … Respondent JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. This special leave petition is filed by the … the petitioner and the respondent, are companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner company is a “Stock Exchange” within the meaning of the expression “stock exchange” defined under Section 2(j)[1]. of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bombay Stock Exchange Vs. Jaya I. Shah and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: AIR2004SC55; I(2004)BC351(SC); [2003]117CompCas595(SC); (2004)1CompLJ1(SC); (2003)185CTR(SC)36; JT2003(8)SC365; 2003(8)SCALE702; (2004)1SCC160; [2003]47SCL776(SC); 2004(1)U
of Bombay v. K. R. P. Shroff and Ors. . In that case a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange had lost his membership for being a defaulter. The main question which arose for determination there was whether … regulation and control of contracts, whereas rules relate to in general to the constitution and management of a stock exchange.39. A contract has been defined to mean a contract for or relating to purchase or sale of securities.
Stock Exchange, Bombay Vs. V.S. Kandalgaonkar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4354 of 2003 The Stock Exchange, Bombay …….Appellant Versus V.S. Kandalgaonkar & Ors. ..….Respondents JUDGMENT R.F.Nariman, J.1. The present matter arises as the result … & Ors. ..….Respondents JUDGMENT R.F.Nariman, J.1. The present matter arises as the result of a member of a Stock Exchange being declared a defaulter. The Income Tax Department claims that it has priority over all debts owed by
The Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-02-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC1071; [2001]105CompCas76(SC); (2001)2CompLJ201(SC); (2001)166CTR(SC)285; [2001]248ITR209(SC); JT2001(3)SC378; 2001(2)SCALE352; (2001)3SCC559; [2001]2SCR255
Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. The Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad, the appellant, admitted Rajesh Shah as its member on 19th February, 1988. He died on 7th February, … on 7th February, 1994. On 12th February, 1994, heirs and legal representatives of Rajesh Shah wrote to the Stock Exchange that they were unable to meet the liabilities of the deceased. The Governing Board of the Stock Exchange
Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-20-1997
Reported in: AIR1961SC1144; (1997)139CTR(SC)455; [1997]225ITR235(SC); JT1997(4)SC355; 1997(3)SCALE353; (1997)11SCC583; [1997]3SCR130
and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.1. The common question that falls for consideration in these appeals filed by the Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') is whether the assessee is entitled to claim exemption from … Share Brokers Association Ltd. The object for which the assessee was established was generally that of conducting a Stock Exchange and thus to promote and regulate the business in stocks, shares, debentures and other securities, to frame rules
Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-30-1960
Reported in: [1961]2SCR798
stocks, Government securities, bonds and equities of any description and with a view thereto, to establish and conduct Stock Exchange in Delhi and/or elsewhere. Its capital is Rs. 5,00,000 divided into 250 shares of Rs. 2,000 each on … membership. It also found that the real object of the company was to carry on business as a Stock Exchange and the earning of profits. It was held therefore that the admission fees fell within the ambit of
Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-30-1960
Reported in: [1961]41ITR495(SC)
stocks, Government securities, bonds and equities of any description and with a view thereto, to establish and conduct stock exchange in Delhi and or elsewhere. Its capital is Rs. 5,00,000 divided into 250 shares of Rs. 2,000 each … membership. It also found that the real object of the company was to carry on business as a stock exchange and the earning of profits. It was held therefore that the admission fees fell within the ambit of
The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited Vs. Mrs. Anuradha Malik
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-12-2016
C.S.No.38 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited versus MRS.Anuradha Malik For the Plaintiff : Mr.Moloy Ghosh, Sr.Advocate Mr.Rupak Ghosh, Advocate Mr.K.Chatterjee, Advocate Ms.S.Saha, Advocate … on : March 16, 2016 Judgment on : May 12, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J. The plaintiff as a stock exchange has sought to recover amounts of default from the defendant as its member along with interest thereon. According
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free