Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Stock Exchange - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2000

Delhi Stock Exchange Association Limited Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Kara ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-24-2000

Reported in: 2000(55)DRJ681; [2000(86)FLR705]; (2000)IILLJ436Del

39 Rule 4 CPC) filed in a suit for injunction are being disposed of. 2. Plaintiff is a Stock Exchange duly recognised/licensed under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 having a strength of about 185 employees. Defendant No.


Feb 25 2003

The Madras Stock Exchange Limited Rep. by Its Secretary Vs. S.S.R. Raj ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-25-2003

Reported in: [2003]116CompCas214(Mad); (2003)4CompLJ50(Mad); [2004]49SCL319(Mad)

the question whether any interim order should issue to continue the appellant as a Member of the defendant Stock Exchange Company. The trial Court has declined to grant the application. In the appeal, however, the appellant has preferred … the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 seeking a declaration that the applicant continued to be Member of the Madras Stock Exchange notwithstanding the order of expulsion which the Committee had made and which had been duly communicated, that order


Dec 11 2015

Calcutta Stock Exchange Vs. M/S Blb Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-11-2015

Non-reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.36711 OF2014Calcutta Stock Exchange … Petitioner Versus BLB Limited … Respondent JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. This special leave petition is filed by the … the petitioner and the respondent, are companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner company is a “Stock Exchange” within the meaning of the expression “stock exchange” defined under Section 2(j)[1]. of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 17 2003

Bombay Stock Exchange Vs. Jaya I. Shah and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-17-2003

Reported in: AIR2004SC55; I(2004)BC351(SC); [2003]117CompCas595(SC); (2004)1CompLJ1(SC); (2003)185CTR(SC)36; JT2003(8)SC365; 2003(8)SCALE702; (2004)1SCC160; [2003]47SCL776(SC); 2004(1)U

of Bombay v. K. R. P. Shroff and Ors. . In that case a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange had lost his membership for being a defaulter. The main question which arose for determination there was whether … regulation and control of contracts, whereas rules relate to in general to the constitution and management of a stock exchange.39. A contract has been defined to mean a contract for or relating to purchase or sale of securities.


Sep 25 2014

Stock Exchange, Bombay Vs. V.S. Kandalgaonkar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-25-2014

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4354 of 2003 The Stock Exchange, Bombay …….Appellant Versus V.S. Kandalgaonkar & Ors. ..….Respondents JUDGMENT R.F.Nariman, J.1. The present matter arises as the result … & Ors. ..….Respondents JUDGMENT R.F.Nariman, J.1. The present matter arises as the result of a member of a Stock Exchange being declared a defaulter. The Income Tax Department claims that it has priority over all debts owed by


Mar 02 2001

The Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, A ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-02-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1071; [2001]105CompCas76(SC); (2001)2CompLJ201(SC); (2001)166CTR(SC)285; [2001]248ITR209(SC); JT2001(3)SC378; 2001(2)SCALE352; (2001)3SCC559; [2001]2SCR255

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. The Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad, the appellant, admitted Rajesh Shah as its member on 19th February, 1988. He died on 7th February, … on 7th February, 1994. On 12th February, 1994, heirs and legal representatives of Rajesh Shah wrote to the Stock Exchange that they were unable to meet the liabilities of the deceased. The Governing Board of the Stock Exchange


Mar 20 1997

Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-20-1997

Reported in: AIR1961SC1144; (1997)139CTR(SC)455; [1997]225ITR235(SC); JT1997(4)SC355; 1997(3)SCALE353; (1997)11SCC583; [1997]3SCR130

and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.1. The common question that falls for consideration in these appeals filed by the Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') is whether the assessee is entitled to claim exemption from … Share Brokers Association Ltd. The object for which the assessee was established was generally that of conducting a Stock Exchange and thus to promote and regulate the business in stocks, shares, debentures and other securities, to frame rules


Nov 30 1960

Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-30-1960

Reported in: [1961]2SCR798

stocks, Government securities, bonds and equities of any description and with a view thereto, to establish and conduct Stock Exchange in Delhi and/or elsewhere. Its capital is Rs. 5,00,000 divided into 250 shares of Rs. 2,000 each on … membership. It also found that the real object of the company was to carry on business as a Stock Exchange and the earning of profits. It was held therefore that the admission fees fell within the ambit of


Nov 30 1960

Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-30-1960

Reported in: [1961]41ITR495(SC)

stocks, Government securities, bonds and equities of any description and with a view thereto, to establish and conduct stock exchange in Delhi and or elsewhere. Its capital is Rs. 5,00,000 divided into 250 shares of Rs. 2,000 each … membership. It also found that the real object of the company was to carry on business as a stock exchange and the earning of profits. It was held therefore that the admission fees fell within the ambit of


May 12 2016

The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited Vs. Mrs. Anuradha Malik

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-12-2016

C.S.No.38 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited versus MRS.Anuradha Malik For the Plaintiff : Mr.Moloy Ghosh, Sr.Advocate Mr.Rupak Ghosh, Advocate Mr.K.Chatterjee, Advocate Ms.S.Saha, Advocate … on : March 16, 2016 Judgment on : May 12, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J. The plaintiff as a stock exchange has sought to recover amounts of default from the defendant as its member along with interest thereon. According


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial