Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1965Guj87; (1964)10GLR769
Miabhoy, J.(1) In this group of six appeals, a preliminary objection has been raised for decision. The objection was first raised when Letters Patent Appeal No. 8 of 1960 was called out for hearing. As the objection affected a number of other Letters Patent Appeals, we adjourned the hearing of the appeal and directed that all other Letters Patent Appeals in which the same objection was likely to be raised should be fixed for hearing them together so that the preliminary objection, if raised, could be decided after hearing all the learned Advocates appearing therein. It is in pursuance of that order that all the above appeals are fixed for hearing the preliminary objection if the same happens to be raised. This judgment will dispose of the preliminary objection which is raised by all the learned Advocates for the respondents in all the appeals.(2) The preliminary objection is that the present appeals are incompetent without the certificate of the learned Judgers of he Bombay High Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC663REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5267 of 2024 ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS V.V. BRAHMA REDDY & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5268 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5269 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5270 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5271 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5272 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5273 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5274 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5275 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5276 of 2024 1 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5277 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5278 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5279 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5280 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5281 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5282 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5283 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5284 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5285 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5286 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5287 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5288 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5289 of 2024 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No.15400 OF2024(EDN-RES) BETWEEN: MEGHANA KURUVALLI, AGED18YEARS, D/O RENUKA REDDY KURUVALLI, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VALMARK CITYVILLE, VILLAMENT533 14TH BLOCK, OFF BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, THEJASWINI NAGAR PHASE1 HOBLI CHANDRASHEKARPURA, VILLAGE BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 076. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI AJOY KUMAR PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY, SAMPIGE ROAD, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 012, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. 3 . DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION IN KARNATAKA, - 2 - BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (OLD BUILDING), K.R. ROAD, FORT, BENGALURU-560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC578REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.348 OF2023GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. Section 3(3)(b)(i) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 19571 provides that the Lieutenant Governor2 of National Capital Territory of Delhi3 shall nominate 10 persons with special knowledge in municipal administration to the DMC. The question for our consideration is whether the Lt. Governor can exercise that power of nomination as a statutory duty attached to his office or he is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of NCTD as provided in Article 239AA(4) of the Constitution. 1 Hereinafter referred to as the DMC Act and DMC for Delhi Municipal Corporation. 2 After the establishment of Legislative Assembly for the Union Territory of Delhi, the Administrator is redesignated as Lieutenant Governor. 3 Hereinafter ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC447IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2668 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9052 of 2021) NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in Criminal Appeal (D) No.11/2020 dated 27.04.2021 by which the judgment rendered by the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency (NIA) (3rd Additional Sessions Judge) Jammu, has been confirmed in part, while remitting the issue pertaining to the charges framed under Sections 306 and 411 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code SVT., 1989 (hereinafter referred to as RPC, 1989) along with Section 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as UAPA, 1967) for taking cognizance afresh. 13. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC439IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8978/2019 M/S SUNDEW PROPERTIES LIMITED APPELLANTS VERSUS TELANGANA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.THE CHALLENGE1 This is a statutory appeal before us under section 125 of the Indian Electricity Act, 20031. It registers a challenge to the judgment and order dated 27th September, 2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity2 1 Electricity Act 2 APTEL Page 1 of 24 dismissing an appeal carried under section 111 of the Electricity Act by the appellant from the judgment and order dated 15th February, 2016 passed by the Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission3. Consequently, the impugned judgment and order of the TSERC was upheld. BRIEF FACTS2 The basic facts giving rise to this appeal are not disputed. A brief overview of the facts and the trajectory of proceedings, relevant for a decision on the present appeal, are set out...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC348IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5366-5367 OF2024FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIA APPELLANTS LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS M/S COROMANDAL SACKS PRIVATE LIMITED RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ............................................................................................. 2 i. Case of the original plaintiff before the trial court ...................................... 4 ii. Case of the original defendants before the trial court .................................. 6 iii. Appeals before the High Court .................................................................... 9 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS/ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS .................................................................................................... 10 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF ..........
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC243IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1891-1966 OF2024UNION OF INDIA ...APPELLANT(S) ROMIT NANDAN SAHAI VERSUS M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of the exposition, this judgement is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 2 B. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ... 8 C. IMPUGNED ORDER ............................................................................. 11 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ....................... 13 E. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT .................... 16 Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 1 of 95 F. ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Sco...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC119REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1663 of 2019) CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD ...APPELLANT VERSUS TARSEM LAL ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by judgment dated 10.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, the appellant/Chandigarh Housing Board has preferred this appeal. Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.1663 of 2019 Page 1 of 313. Briefly stated, the facts pertinent to the adjudication of the present appeal are that the appellant herein, vide advertisement dated 28.06.1983, had called for applications for allotment of houses exclusively for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and a total of 35 houses in the HIG (Upper) and HIG (Lower) categories were reserved for that purpose. This advertisement was issued pursuant to Regulation 25 of the Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1979 wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:3759 WP No.28714 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.28714 OF2023(GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. PT. BARA DAYA ENERGI INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.106-A/9 COAL GRAND COMPLEX ETTAYAPURAM ROAD, TUTICORIN TAMIL NADU 628 002 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SHIVALINGAIAH PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.BASAVARAJA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KANISHK RAVINDRAN, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY.2. KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RO(EM) No.82, SHAKTI BHAVAN, III FLOOR - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:3759 WP No.28714 of 2023 RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU 560 001. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. AJAY J.NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS F...
Tag this Judgment!