Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: states reorganisation act 1956 section 56 form of writs and other processes Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 26 results (0.034 seconds)

Feb 27 2017 (HC)

Dr. S. Shoba Rani Vs. The State Reorganization Department rep by its S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Sanjay Kumar, J. The petitioner is the applicant in O.A.No.2358 of 2016 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity, the Tribunal ). By order dated 24.06.2016, the Tribunal admitted the O.A. and while ordering notice to the respondents, directed that the final allocation of the petitioner to the State of Telangana would be subject to the final result in the O.A. Aggrieved by the denial of interim relief, the petitioner is before this Court. The petitioner was appointed as a Lecturer at Kurnool in Zone IV on 20.07.1992 and was thereafter transferred to Visakhapatnam in Zone I on her own request, as her husband was working at BHEL, Visakhapatnam. She thereupon took the last rank in terms of seniority in the cadre of Lecturers at Visakhapatnam. She was promoted as a Principal in September, 2012, basing upon her reduced seniority. After bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh, the authorities sought her option for allocation to one of the...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2017 (HC)

Preetesh Kumar Vs. The State of Telangana and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

1. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings dated 24.06.2016 in Crl.R.P.No.111 of 2016 passed by the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, whereby confirmed the order dated 18.04.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.1704 of 2015 in C.C.No.33 of 2014 of the IX Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.33 of 2014 on the file of the IX Special Magistrate Court, Hyderabad, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the Act ). The 2nd respondent is the complainant and filed a private complaint against the petitioner/accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act, contending that there is a legally enforceable debt and that the cheque was issued towards discharge of legally enforceable debt, which was dishonoured on presentation. Thereafter, he issued notice in compliance of Section 138 of the Act demanding the petitioner/accused to pay the amount covere...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2016 (HC)

T. Ashok Kumar and Another Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. The 2 petitioners in this writ petition are appointed as members of the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad. The 1st petitioner herein was appointed as such for a term of 5years or up to the age 67years, whichever is earlier by order contained in G.O.Rt.No.65 Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS.III) Department, dated 21.07.2011. The 2nd petitioner was appointed, subject to similar terms, by the Government through their G.O.Rt.No.12 Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS.III) Department, dated 25.01.2012. Both of them have assumed charge as members of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (henceforth referred to as State Commission ?) and started functioning as such. The Registrar of the State Commission issued Notification No.2 dated 02.04.2015, as per the directions of the 3rd respondent, the President of the Commission, informing all parties and their counsel that the matters earlier ma...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2015 (HC)

M/s. Oil Palm Developers and Processors Association and Others Vs. Sta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

1. Heard Sri E.Manohar, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Agriculture, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri S.Appadhara Reddy, learned counsel for 5th respondent. 2. The 1st petitioner is an association of oil palm developers and processors. Petitioner Nos.2, 3 and 4 are Companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956 who are oil palm developers and processors and also members of the 1st petitioner-association. 3. In this Writ Petition, they question G.O.Ms.No.2 dt.18-02-2015 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agricultural and Co-operation (Horti and Sericulture) Department. 4. Under this G.O.Ms, the State Government had adopted a formula for pricing of oil palm fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) for the oil year from 01-11-2014 to 31-10-2015 in exercise of powers conferred under Section 13 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Oil Palm (Regulation of Production and Processing) Act, 1993 (for...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2015 (HC)

Prasad Sushee Joint Venture, Hyderabad Vs. The Singareni Colleries Com ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner herein questions the action of the 2nd respondent in considering the bid of the 3rd respondent and declaring it as the successful tenderer on 16.05.2015 in respect of the notified works, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional. 2. It is stated that the 2nd respondent has issued a e-Tender Notice, (hereinafter referred to as the NIT ?) in respect of the works pertaining to Drilling, Excavation, Loading, Transportation, Dumping, Spreading and Levelling etc., of 1896.286 LBCM of overburden (i.e., 1863.006 LBM of In-Situ OB and 33.280 LCM of Coal) by using HEMM including Additional works viz., 6.00 lakh Drilling Meterage, 1500 Shovel Hours, 1500 Dozer Hours and De-silting of 3 LBCM from 2 No's of Cheruvu/Tanks at RKOCP, Mandamarri area for a period of 72 months “ Enquiry No: E111300503, dated 12.03.2015. The tenders submitted were opened on 16.05.2015 at 5-00 p.m., and out of 12 bids received, one was disqualified technically and, the other...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2015 (HC)

Sonapala Balaraju and Others Vs. State of Telangana, rep. By its Princ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Common Order: (R. Subhash Reddy, J.) 1. As common question of law arise for consideration in this batch of cases on similar set of facts, all the writ petitions are heard together at interlocutory stage, with the consent of counsel for the parties and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions seek declaration by way of Mandamus, to declare the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.3, Backward Classes Welfare (OP) Department, dated 14.08.2014 and G.O.Ms.No.16, Backward Classes Welfare (OP) Department, dated 11.03.2015, in the absence of any recommendations by the Commission for Backward Classes, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to issue caste certificates to their wards as per their backward class community. 3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, vide G.O.Ms.No.1793, Education Department, dated 23.09.1970, based on the recommendations made by the Andhra Pradesh Commission for Backward Classes (Anantharaman Commission), h...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2015 (HC)

Anwar-Ul-Uloom Educational Association A Vs. State of Telangana,rep.By ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.14504 of 2015 07-07-2015 Anwar-ul-Uloom Educational Association And another. Petitioners State of Telangana,Rep.by its Principal Secretary,Minority Welfare Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad,And others.Respondents Counsel for petitioneRs.Sr.S.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : The Advocate General ?. CITATIONS: 1.AIR1964SC7772.2015 (4) ALT44(DB) THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.14504 of 2015 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Advocate General for the respondents. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the appointment of the second respondent as a competent authority vide G.O.Rt.No.71, dated 05.05.2015, and for a direction to the fiRs.respondent to forthwith constitute a Waqf Board in accordance with Section 14 of the Waqf Act, 1995. The admitted case of the parties is that the tenure of the erstwhile Waqf Board came to an end in December, 2013, and...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2015 (HC)

Govindu Venkata Sivananda Murt Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh,pancha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.40667 of 2014 653 of 2015 23-06-2015 Govindu Venkata Sivananda Murthy... PETITIONER The State of Andhra Pradesh,Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (R.D.I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government, and others...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. O.Manoher Reddy Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao Mr. C.Nageshwara Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj ?.Cases referred 2010 (4) ALD776(DB) 2 2004 (2) ALD1(LB) The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P. Nos. 40667, 41232 of 2014 and 653 of 2015 COMMON ORDER : As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by way of this common order.2. All these writ petitions are filed assailing the G.O.Ms.No.135, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (R.D.I) Department, dated 17.09.2014 issued by the first respondent. All the writ petitioners in...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

The a.P.State Council of Higher Educati Vs. The Union ofindia, Rep., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos. 1873 OF201501-05-2015 The A.P. State Council of Higher Education rep., by its Secretary (FAC), Hyderabad...Petitioner The Union of India, rep., by Ministry of Law & Legislation and Company Affairs, Central Secretariat Buildings, New Delhi & four others....Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Advocate General (A.P.) Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri B. Narayana Reddy (Asst. Solicitor General) Counsel for respondents 2&3: Sri E. Madan Mohan Counsel for respondents 4&5: Advocate General (TG) ?. Cases referred 1. (2006) 1 SCC442= AIR2006SC6612. (2014) 12 SCC6963. AIR1963SC8534. AIR1970SC14465. (2006) 5 SCC330THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.1873 & 2882 of 2015 Date:01. 05.2015 In W.P.No.1873 of 2015: Between The A.P. State Council of Higher Education (A statutory Body pursuant to Legislation vide Act 16/1988...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2014 (HC)

The Superintendent of Customs (Cus-prev) Vs. Kannur Abdul Kader Mohamm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

THE HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5846 OF201406-08-2014 The Superintendent of Customs (Cus-Prev) Hyderabad-II Commissionerate, Hqrs Office Kendriya Shulk Bhavan, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad-500004 rep. by Special P.P. Petitioner/ Complainant Kannur Abdul Kader Mohammed HaneefaS/o. Sri Abdul Khader Kannur Bayan Kunhi, Age:33. years, r/o. Penne House, 1/90(50)Sooramsani Kannur Post,Kasargod District-671321 Kerala State Respondent/ Accused Counsel for the Petitioner/ Complainant : Sri U.L.N. Sudhakar Special Public Prosecutor for Customs, Hyderabad. Counsel for Respondent/ Accused : M.Jagadish Kumar, Counsel for respondent. : ?. Cases referred:01. 1987 ELT324(AP) 02. 1997(2) ALT (Crl.) 529 (DB) (AP) 03. 2012(3) SCC Crl.1249 04. 1987(32) ELT32405. 1976 (1) Crl LJ page 386 06. 1985(3) (AP) Crl. LJ Short notes 15 07. 1959 Madya Pradesh 147 08. AIR1984SC71809. AIR1984SC68410. 1988 Crl.L.J.1117 11. 1993 Crl.L.J.2436 12. AIR1955SC19613. AIR1964SC22114. AIR1968SC129215....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //