Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.11158/2013 C/W W.P.Nos.43928/2012, 11966/2013 23287/2013, 62434/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF MAY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT W.P. No.11158/2013(LR) C/W W.P.Nos.43928/2012, 11966/2013, 23287/2013, 62434/2016(LR) IN W.P.No.11158/2013: BETWEEN:1. SRI. CLARENCE PAIS, AGED ABOUT84YEARS, S/O LATE L C PAIS, ADVOCATE & NOTARY, RESIDING AT LIGHT HOUSE HILL, MANGALOREF-575 001. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.2. THE DIOCESE OF MANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY LORD BISHOP, REV DR. ALOYSIUS P D SOUZA, AGED ABOUT71YEARS, SON OF LATE MATHIAS D SOUZA, RESIDING AT BISHOPS HOUSE, KODIALBAIL, MANGALORE-575 003. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTTRICT.3. SRIMAD ANANTHESHWARA TEMPLE, MANJESHWAR KERALA STATE, REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE, K GOKULDAS BHAT, AGED ABOUT70YEARS, SON OF LATE A V P BHAT, RESIDING AT "VARALAXMI" - 2 - WP No.11158/2013 C/W W.P.Nos.43928/2012, 11966/2013 23287/2013, 62434/2016 NEAR S V TEMPLE, KATAPADI574105. UDUPI DISTRICT.4. R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.46495 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF MAY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.46495 OF2012(GM-KEB) BETWEEN:1. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE, AT CAUVERY BHAVAN, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY FINANCIAL ADVISOR2 STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTRE KPTCL, NO.28, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHIEF ENGINEER. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. SRIRANGA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND AND SMT. ASHWINI N. RAVINDRA, ADVOCATES) AND:1. M/S SHAMANUR SUGARS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT #374 4TH MAIN P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE KARNATAKA-577 002. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2. CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATION COMMISSION - 2 - WP No.46495 of 2012 3RD & 4TH FLOOR, CHANDERLOK BUILDING,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2023@SLP (C) NOs. 34255-34256 OF2015THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M. RAMA RAO & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER VIKRAM NATH, J.Leave granted 2. Despite service of notice, none of the respondents have put in appearance as such the matter has been heard ex parte.3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has assailed the correctness of judgments and orders dated 12.06.2014 and 29.04.2014 passed by Division 2 Bench of the High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh whereby the writ petitions were allowed and the order dated 28.11.2011 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad in a batch of applications (leading case O.A.No.283 of 2010) was set aside upholding the validity of Government orders which had been set aside by the Tribunal.4. The State of Andhra Pradesh had issued G.O.Ms. No.3 dated 10.01.2000 providing f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2357 of 2017 Government of NCT of Delhi Appellant Versus Union of India Respondent 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI A. The Reference .............................................................................................. 4 B. Submissions ............................................................................................... 11 C. Interpretation of Article 239AA: The 2018 Constitution Bench judgment ... 15 (a) Delhi: A Sui Generis model ..................................................................... 15 (b) Legislative and executive power of the Legislative Assembly of NCTD .. 19 (c) Insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories ................... 23 D. The class of Union territories ......................................................................... 30 E. Maintaining the balance of local interest and national interest ........................ 35 F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1682-1683 OF2022M.K. RAJAGOPALAN ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER . RESPONDENT(S) & ANR. WITH C.A. No.1756/2022 C.A. No.1759/2022 C.A. No.1757/2022 C.A. No.1807/2022 C.A. No.1810/2022 C.A. No.1827/2022 JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Preliminary and brief outline .............................................................................. 2 Particulars of the proceedings and the parties .................................................. 7 The relevant factual and background aspects ................................................ 13 Initiation of CIRP ................................................................................................... 14 CoC Meetings and ancillary proceedings .............................................................. 16 Resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) .................... 26 Disapproval of the Appellate Tribunal (N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.421 OF2019Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Ors. Respondent(s) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.777 OF2020Manoj Kumar Nagar Appellant(s) Versus Union of India Respondent(s) AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.712 OF2020Raj Kumar Verma Appellant(s) Versus Union of India Respondent(s) Writ Petition (C) No.421 of 2019 Page 1 of 74 JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Writ Petition (C) No.421 of 2019 1. By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, filed by the writ petitioner Moser Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is also prayed to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus so as to leave the stat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 309 OF2023P. V. NIDHISH & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeal1 was heard finally, with the consent of counsel for parties. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment of the Kerala High Court2 rejecting their petition under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereafter Cr. PC). They had, through those proceedings, sought a direction to quash a criminal complaint instituted against them. I2 The appellants urge that one P.M. Mammu Haji leased two shop rooms (numbered as municipal numbers VII/214 and VII/215- hereafter the premises), 1 Crl. A. No.309 / 2023. 2 Dated 03.03.2016 in Crl. MC No.5072/2015. 2 long ago (in 1916), before the coming into force of the Wakf Act. Norman Printing Bureau (hereafter the Bureau) was a concern of Achuthan Nair; it was functioning in the premises. A partnership ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8553-8557 OF2014STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.701 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8556 OF2014@ C.A. NOS .8553-8557 OF2014CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.674 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8555 OF2014@ CA NOS. 8553-8557 OF2014CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.916 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8557 OF2014@ CA NOS.8553-8557 OF2014JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. These civil appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad confirming the order of the learned Single Judge, holding that the 1 respondents possessing a degree of BAMS (Bachelor of Ayurved in Medicine and Surgery) should be treated at par with the doctors holding MBBS degrees and that they are entitled to the benefits of the recommendations of the Tikku Pay Commission.2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. On the basis of a M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF APRIL, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.20083 OF2022(GM RES) BETWEEN:1. . THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (HEAD OF FOREST FORCE) ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BENGALURU 560 003. 2 . THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS BELLARI CIRCLE KALAMMA STREET MOTHI CIRCLE BALLARI 583 101. 3 . THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS CHITRADURGA DIVISION V P EXTENSION CHITRADURGA 577 501. 4 . THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (FOREST CONSERVATION ) AND NODAL OFFICER (FCA) 3RD FLOOR, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BENGALURU 560 003. 2 5 . THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA ROOM NO.320, 3RD FLOOR VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI DHYAN CHINNAPPA, AAG A/W SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA) AND: M/S. WIND WORLD (INDIA) LTD., THROUGH MR.SHAILEN SHAH THE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF WIND WORLD (INDIA) LIMITED REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES AC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 6805 of 2022 Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Appellant Association versus Union of India & others Respondents And With Civil Appeal No 6806 of 2022 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Background ....................................................................................................... 4 i. Factual background ...................................................................................... 4 ii. The impugned judgment ............................................................................ 10 B. Submissions ................................................................................................... 12 C. Issues ............................................................................................................... 17 D. Analysis ........................................................................................................... ...
Tag this Judgment!