Statement - Judgment Search Results

“statement of Complainant Was Recorded on 6.7.2008 Whereas Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and placed on record, by the investigating agency, for the reasons best known to it. Even from the statement of complainant Barinder Singh, there is nothing to suggest that intention of the accused was to kill him.

The Statements of Eight Persons Have Been Recorded in Favour of Vs. Fi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.23658 of 2012 2 the statements of eight persons have been recorded in favour of respondent by AC IInd Grade on 22.8.2005. One more

“written Statement Is Not Filed by the Defendants. Vs. Ajay Sharma

Court: Punjab and Haryana

order dated 22.8.2013 dismissing an application filed by the petitioners for condoning the delay in filing the written statement. As a matter of fact, on 07.6.2012, defence of the petitioners was struck off in the following order:-

Chatur Bhuj Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Vs. Respective Statements with Regar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

parties were directed to appear on 08.05.2013, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court also directed to send a detailed report in this

State of Orissa and Others Vs. Commissioner of Land Records and Statem ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC3067; JT1998(5)SC662; 1998(4)SCALE682; (1998)7SCC162; [1998]Supp1SCR130

Principle falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus has no application in India. Only because eye-witness deviated from her statement made in F.I.R. in respect of one accused, her evidence cannot be held to be totally unreliable. INDIAN

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and ors.] on ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

July, 2005 [CWP No.7651 of 2005, Gurdeep Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.]., on the statement made by the Advocate General, Haryana that the Government shall constitute a High Powered Committee to examine the

“it Is Correct That Neither the Statements of the Parties nor Vs. Hi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

taken by the respondents against the petitioner has been defended. However, in the penultimate para of the written statement, it has been stated that the petitioner has, vide his letter bearing endorsement No.773 dated 11.6.2012 of Civil

“2. on the Statement Ex.P1 of Complainant Vishal Son of Vs. Vishal . ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and 324 IPC and on 8.10.2012, he was sentenced accordingly. The process of law was started on a statement Ex.P1, made by the applicant-complainant Vishal (PW-1).It was an allegation against the respondent and his co-accused Surinder that,

“13. from the Perusal of the Statements of All the Aforesaid Vs. Seh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

arrested on 16.12.2010 and he was got medico legally examined by Dr. HaRs.Chauhan PW-9. The Investigating Officer recorded statements of the witnesses. The investigation was verified by SHO Gajender Kumar CRM-A No.896-MA of 2012 -3- PW-13. Thereafter,

“The Enquiry Officer Recorded the Statements of 10 Prosecution Witne ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

witness Devi Dayal-PW-5 turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case. Both the witnesses resiled from their statements made by them to the police during the couRs.of the investigation and gave a clean chit to the