Stated Value - Judgment Search Results

The Raj. State Mines and Minerals Ltd Vs. State and ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

can be excavated so that the electricity facility can be provided to the public at large”.It is further stated that the Collector, Barmer, within whose territorial authority the land in question is situated, has also made an

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. State and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1966)ILLJ488Ker

Rangachari : (1970)IILLJ289SC . In the latter case the Supreme Court extracted Article 16(1) of the Constitution and stated as follows:In deciding the scope and ambit of the fundamental right of equality of opportunity guaranteed by this

State Vs. Siddarth Vashisth and Manu Sharma and Others and Raja Chopra ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001IIIAD(Delhi)829; 2001CriLJ2404; 90(2001)DLT548

for the parties and perused the records.4. The facts, leading to filing of the above revision petitions, briefly stated, are that on the intervening night of 29th and 30th April, 1999, a party was going on at … the charge should be framed as at this stage the facts have to be taken at their face value only.33. The Apex Court in Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi, Advocate Vs . Jitendra Bhimraj Bijja : 1990CriLJ1869

Ramu Vs. State By

Court: Karnataka

M.O.68 - her Nokia mobile and she has narrated the entire incident of rape committed on her as stated in the complaint Ex.P.48. Nothing has been elicited in her cross-examination to disbelieve her testimony with regard to … not in a position even to issue notice for enhancement of the punishment to the accused.44. The probative value of the forensic report and the statement of Assistant Chemical Analyser are very high on account of perfect

Raja Vs. State By

Court: Karnataka

M.O.68 - her Nokia mobile and she has narrated the entire incident of rape committed on her as stated in the complaint Ex.P.48. Nothing has been elicited in her cross-examination to disbelieve her testimony with regard to … not in a position even to issue notice for enhancement of the punishment to the accused.44. The probative value of the forensic report and the statement of Assistant Chemical Analyser are very high on account of perfect

Punith Vs. State By

Court: Karnataka

is required to be noted that in the registered agreement to sell dated 27-10-2010, the sale consideration is stated to be Rs 25 lakhs and with no reference to payment of Rs 25 lakhs to Ms Munni … EzÀPÉÌ M¦àPÉÆArgÀÄvÃÉÛ£É. F »AzÉ PÉÆnÖgÀĪÀ ZÉPïUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɹ ¨ÁQ PÉÆqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ZÉPïUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆqÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ¸À»/- ¸À»/- ¥Àæ«ÄüÀ gÀWÄÀ @ gÁWÀªÉÃAzÀæ (Emphasis added) 9. After about two months of the said undertaking/communication by the complainant, the alleged incident is said to

State By Vs. Mithun Kumar

Court: Karnataka

that the victim aged about 16 years had filed a complaint making allegations against the accused. It is stated in the complaint allegations that the victim was residing along with her mother/ PW-2, father / CW-2, sister

State By Vs. T Manjunath

Court: Karnataka

Commissioner of Transport wherein, in paragraph 6, the Commissioner of Transport referred the Notification dated 11.02.2010 and categorically stated that in terms of the said Notification, in respect of Group-B Officer, except the Tahsildar Group-II, appointed the

Aslam vs State

Court: Delhi

FIR No. 106/1998 registered at P.S. Nabi Karim, Delhi, challenges a purported “Punishment Ticket” dated 23.07.2024, which is stated to have been issued by the Jail Authorities. 2. Mr. Yugansh Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits

State vs Vinod Kumar Ahuja

Court: Delhi

about the incident, the accused came out from his shop with a long knife in his hand and stated “Aaj Inko Sabak Sikha Deta Hoon”, and thereafter immediately stabbed the complainant (PW-1) in his stomach. When PW-2,