State V Poonam - Judgment Search Results

The State (Delhi Administration) Vs. Pali Ram

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC14; 1979CriLJ17; (1979)2SCC158; [1979]1SCR931; 1978 Cri LJ 17

followed in the impugned judgment by the Delhi High Court, and also by the Bombay High Court in State v. Poonam Chand Gupta : AIR1958Bom207 inasmuch as it is held therein, that the second clause of Section 73 limits … in Hiralal Agarwala's case (supra) was followed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in State v. Poonam Chand Gupta, (supra) wherein it was held that the second clause of Section 73 limits the power of

Anupal Singh . Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secret ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

by impleading them by issuance of notice in accordance with law vide Poonam v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2016) 2 SCC779 In the … THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4815 OF2019REPORTABLE ANUPAL SINGH AND OTHERS ...Appellants VERSUS STATE OF U.P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ...Respondents WITH C.A. No.4817/2019, C.A. No.4816/2019, C.A. No.4819/2019, C.A. … IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4815 OF2019REPORTABLE ANUPAL SINGH AND OTHERS ...Appellants VERSUS STATE OF U.P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ...Respondents WITH C.A. No.4817/2019, C.A. No.4816/2019, C.A. No.4819/2019,

Moreshar Yadaorao Mahajan Vs. Vyankatesh Sitaram Bhedi(d) Tr.lrs.

Court: Supreme Court of India

have been passed. He also relies on the judgment of this Court in the case of Poonam v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others3.11. A perusal of the plaint would reveal that the plaintiff himself, in paragraph

Vishu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan versus the State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1371

SCR 663 : (2022) 14 SCC 252; Sathyanath v. Sarojamani[2022] 4 SCR 46 : (2022) 7 SCC 644; Poonam v. State of U.P.[2015] 14 SCR 565 : (2016) 2 SCC 779; Ajay Ishwar Ghute andOrs. v. Meher … [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1371 : 2025 INSC 884Vishu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 7777 of 2023) 23 July 2025 [Surya Kant, Dipankar Dutta*

Uttam Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

of Bihar 6, Arun Bhandudas Pawar v. State of Maharashtra 7, and Poonam Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh 8.8. On the other hand, Mr. Sachin … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.485 OF2012UTTAM .… APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA …. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26th … of 2012 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.485 OF2012UTTAM .… APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA …. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment

Anant Prakash Sinha @ Anant Sinha Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

and orders passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Poonam and anr. V. State of Punjab[6]. and Anant Sinha v. State of … of 2016 (@ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.837 of 2016) Anant Prakash Sinha @ Anant Sinha …Appellant Versus State of Haryana & Anr. …Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Despite completion of a decade from the date of solemnisation … NO.131 of 2016 (@ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.837 of 2016) Anant Prakash Sinha @ Anant Sinha …Appellant Versus State of Haryana & Anr. …Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Despite completion of a decade from the date of

Sunil Fulchand Shah Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC1023; 2000CriLJ1444; 2000(1)CTC694; 2000(68)ECC209; (2000)2GLR1532; JT2000(2)SC230; RLW2000(2)SC213; 2000(1)SCALE660; (2000)3SCC409; [2000]1SCR945; MANU/SC/0109/2000

1981CriLJ1686 , State of Gujarat v. Ismail Jiima : 1982CriLJ421 ; Smt. Poonam Lata v. M.L. Wadhawan. : 1987CriLJ1924 and Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L, … about ten years, during which period detenus were free. In fairness to the learned Attorney-General it must be stated that he fairly conceded this position. I find myself unable to fully subscribe to the view of brother … must be stated that he fairly conceded this position. I find myself unable to fully subscribe to the view of brother Nanavati, J. relating to the treatment of the period during which a detenu is free as

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Shri Noor Mohammad

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2729; (1972)2SCC454; [1973]1SCR841; 1973(5)LC220(SC); 1972()WLN595

have departed from the view taken by that High Court earlier in Poonam Chand v. State of Rajasthan and Anr. I.L.R. II Raj 1031. It … Jaipur-Rohtak route via Shahpura-Katpmli, Behror-Jahar-Rewari. Objections were invited but no objections were filed. Besides the respondent, however, the State Road Transport Corporation and two other persons had applied for the grant of permit on this route. These … to the Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur, for the grant of a non-temporary stage carriage permit on Jaipur-Rohtak route via Shahpura-Katpmli, Behror-Jahar-Rewari. Objections were invited but no objections were filed. Besides the respondent, however, the State Road Transport

Salahudeen vs Noorjahan

Court: Kerala

necessary party, the order passed is a nullity and does not have any binding effect. In Poonam v. State of U.P and Others [2016 (2) SCC 779], the legal position was reiterated by holding that, anorder which

Shahinaj Ali Alavi vs Aligarh Muslim University

Court: Kerala

Even the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the judgments dated 7.5.2010 in W.P. No.5817/2010 (Smriti Patel v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others) and 5654/2010 (Poonam Patidar v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others) also upheld