State V May - Judgment Search Results
Court on Its Own Motion Vs State V. Gurnek Singh Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-11-2010
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.2. To be referred to the … should be conveyed to Shri R.S. Yadav, Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police. This letter was sent to all States D.G.Ps, all Seaports and all Airports. A copy of RCN, issued against the petitioner, is on record. The … petitioner was not able to join the petitioner in Canada, as difference arose between the parties in the very beginning. The petitioner alleged that he was compelled to withdraw the sponsorship made by him for his wife
United States Vs. Karo
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1984
United States v Karo - 468 U.S. 705 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court United States v Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984) … when "there is some meaningful interference with an individual's possessory interests in that property." Ibid. Although the can may have contained an unknown and unwanted foreign object, it cannot be said that anyone's possessory interest was interfered
United States Vs. Sokolow
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-03-1989
United States v Sokolow - 490 U.S. 1 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court United States v Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989) … which varies only in degree. While traveling under an alias or taking an evasive path through an airport may be highly probative, neither type of evidence has the sort of ironclad significance attributed to it by the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
United States Vs. New York Central R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-22-1926
transportation service between the public terminal of a barge canal and points on the railroad and its connections, may be invoked by a state which owns the canal and maintains it for the free use of the … United States v New York Central R. Co. - 272 U.S. 457 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court United States v New
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free