State Information Commission - Judgment Search Results

***** Vs. State Information Commission, Punjab and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

taken up with the said appeal. 2. Counsel for the State does not oppose the aforesaid suggestion. The Division Bench vide order has remanded the issue to the Appellate Authority i.e.State Information Commission, Punjab which has to decide the matter afresh keeping Appeal No.1174 of 2011 Punjab Cricket Association versus State Information Commission, Punjab and another decided on 12.12.2013 and the same may

Ramesh Sharma and anr. Vs. the State Information Commission and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2008P& H126; 2009(234)ELT390(P& H); (2008)2PLR485

which reads thus:20(1) Where the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, at the time ,to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under Sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the receipt of this order under information to the Commission.Announced. To be communicated.3. Dr. Balram Gupta, learned Senior Advocate has

Sanjay Hindwan Vs. State Information Commission Through the Registrar, ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without subsection(1) of section 7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed is whether the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, has any power to impose

Public Service Commission U.P. Vs. State Information Commission and An ...

Court: Allahabad

not find any error in the direction issued by the State Information Commission. For the reasons stated aforesaid, the writ petition find any error in the direction issued by the State Information Commission. For the reasons stated aforesaid, the writ petition is considering the matter, passed an order dated 12.11.2013 directing the Commission to furnish a photocopy of the answer sheet of the

Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-officio Joint Secretary (School Education), Public ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2008Bom120; 2008(4)ALLMR586; (2008)110BOMLR1238; 2008(4)MhLj822

petitioner initially said Not Available and later on corrected her statement and said she does not know and the petitioner provided information. 4. The respondent No. 2 had sought the following information from the P.I.O. under the Right to Information Act, 2005 petitioner submitted that the Goa Information Commission (hereinafter referred as Commission) has wrongly held that the petitioner provided incomplete and misleading

Public Information Officer, Chief Minister's Office, Civil Secretariat ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2008(4)AWC3574

or used by its employees for discharging its functions;(vi) a statement of the categories of documents that are held by it is made and if the Commission is satisfied that the information has wrongly been withheld or has been refused, etc., then the role of the appellate authority or that of the Commission including that of the Chief Information Commissioner is very important,

S.P. Arora, State Public Information Officer-cum-estate Officer, Huda ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2009P& H53; (2008)152PLR557

mole.14. Still further, the previous orders relied upon by the State Information in its reply before this Court cannot be considered, the request for information or knowingly given incorrect or misleading information in a mala fide manner. It is contended that since the Act on the ground of satisfaction, the State Information Commission has proceeded ahead to decide the appeal and also imposed

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Gujarat State Information Commission and ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2007Guj203; (2008)2GLR1559

decision under Sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer-as the case may be shall take into AIR 1963 SC 677 and, therefore, decision of the Public Information Officer under Section 7 is purely administrative in nature and, to the complainant and the public authority.(10) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall

Saiyed HussaIn Abbas Rizwi Vs. State Information Commission Through th ...

Court: Patna

Reported in: AIR2010Pat57

argued at length about the power and function of the State Information Commission, I deem it proper to decide the same things which may be exercised or done by the State Information Commission autonomously without being subjected to directions by any other the State Information Commission. Thus, it is clear that the Commission is constituted of the State Chief Information Commissioner and State

Date of Decision: May 10, 2013 Vs. State Information Commission Punjab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

case before the Public Information Officer or even before the State Information Commission as regards the information sought, disclosure of which, officer even after the expiry of 30 days. While demanding information, as per rules, I had sent postal orders for `10/- the Public Information Officer or even before the State Information Commission as regards the information sought, disclosure of which, would be