Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 36 Court: karnataka Page 7 of about 4,510 results (0.214 seconds)

Basappa and ors. Vs. Garemane Kamanna

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR912; 1985(1)KarLJ207

..... of the act creates an absolute, bar regarding the carrying on of the money lender's business without a licence. the legal effect of transactions, forbidden by law are stated thus, by pollock on contract :'when conditions are prescribed by statute for the conduct of any particular business or profession; and such conditions arenot. observed, agreements made in ..... on 26-3-1974, he did not have the licence, there is no provision in the act to grant a retrospective licence. section 10 of the act clearly states that the licence shall be valid from the date on which it is granted upto 31st december following. therefore, any licence granted under the act can only be prospective ..... of an official receiver, an administrator or a court under the provisions of the mysore insolvency act, 1925, or other corresponding law inforce in any area of the state or of aliquidator under the companies act, 1956, to realise the property of a money-lender.'sub-sections 2, 3 and 4 of section 11 were omitted by .....

Muniswamappa Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3923

..... laxmana gowda's case, their lordships observed as follows:-'two factors mitigate against this submission. firstly, on the day the land was sold it had vested in the state government and the vendor had no title, and secondly, the amended section 7 has taken away the right of unauthorised holder to claim regrant in any circumstances . ..... neither any title to such land nor the right to protect his possession of such land under section 53a of the transfer of property act. however, the state cannot evict such alienee or intending alienee, in possession of a service inam land, if such land had been subsequently regranted to the holder or the authorised holder ..... sought for a declaration that the karnataka village offices abolition (amendment) act, 1978 (act no. 13 of 1978) is invalid.2. the facts of the case briefly stated as follows:-the undisputed facts as disclosed from the pleadings and the impugned orders are that sy. no. 144 measuring 27 guntas situate in hebbiri village, chintamani taluk and .....

Junjamma and ors. Vs. the Bangalore Development Authority, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR608; 2004(7)KarLJ677

..... municipality permission of the municipality is required. it is to be noticed that all these legislations are passed by the state legislature and duly assented by the president of india. it is not in dispute that the state legislature has the competency to pass all these legislations. there is no conflict between these legislations. each legislation is operating ..... user of the land under the master plan in the zonal development plan the state can always acquire the land for public purpose in accordance with the law of the land. therefore ..... the green-belt it cannot be said that the satisfaction of the state government in that behalf is not genuine'.the supreme court in the case s.s. darshan v. state of karnataka and ors., : air1996sc671 and in the case of jainarain and ors. v. union of india and ors., : air1996sc697 has held that whatever may be the .....

Vasantha C. Kerur and Others Vs. B. Basavaraj and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... any partition or testamentary disposition of property, which have taken place before the day of december 2004. the amendment act received the assent of the president of india on 5th september, 2005, and came into force from 9th september, 2005. if the amendment act is prospective in operation the amended law would not ..... succession (amendment) act, 2005, the daughter of a coparcener in a joint family governed by the mithakshara is conferred the status of coparcener, it is expressly stated that she becomes a coparcener by birth. conferment of the status is different from conferring the rights in the coparcenery property. the right to coparcenery property is ..... in 2005, the question would arise that what should happen to the transactions between 1956 and 2005. it is in this context the parliament has expressly stated though the right by birth is given from 1956, if the dispositions, alienations including partitions, testamentary dispositions which had taken place subsequent to 1956 and before .....

Nagawwa Vs. Mallappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1594; 2004(3)KarLJ1

..... however, while considering as to what is a 'proceeding' the learned single judge relying upon the decision of the supreme court in madhu limaye v. state of maharashtra, : 1978crilj165 wherein provisions of section 397 of the criminal procedure code were considered with reference to interlocutory orders referred to therein, and the decision of ..... the supreme court in baldevdas shivlal and anr. v. filmistan distributors (india) private limited and ors., : [1970]1scr435 wherein the supreme court was considering the meaning of the work 'case' in section 115 of the cpc ..... meenakshamma's case, supra, regarding maintainability of revision against certain orders passed in the suit are contrary to the decision of the supreme court as stated above and are uncalled for. therefore, the observations made in that case stand overruled.8. accordingly, we answer the question referred to us by .....

Sri Velu Vs. Sri Nagappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR950

V.G. Sabhahit, J.1. This appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi in RA. No. 15/2000 dated 22.8.2003 allowing the appeal and reversing the judgment and decree passed by the Court of I Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi, in O.S. No. 122/94 dated 15.12.99 and decreeing the suit of the plaintiff.2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this appeal with reference to the rank of the parties before the Trial Court are as follows:The plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendant averring that plaintiff is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property-site measuring 20' X 35' in Sy. No. 222/2 and the same has been allotted to the plaintiff and plaintiff has constructed a house on this site for his residence. He has paid upset price of Rs,. 50/- and revenue records are in the name of the plaintiffs and defendants who have no right, title ...

Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Ors. Vs. the Workmen of ITi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1433

..... lay down at once and for all time, to which industries the act should be applied. conditions of labour vary under different circumstances and from state to state and the expediency of including 'a particular trade or industry within the schedule depends upon a variety of facts which are by no means uniform and ..... act has not been done. learned counsel referred to the conclusions of the supreme court in supreme court advocates-on-record association and another vs. union of india : air1994sc268 , in the matter of consultation with regard to appointment of judges etc. further contending that the delegated legislation or subordinate legislation must conform exactly to ..... the power granted, learned counsel also referred to another decision of the supreme court in supreme court employees welfare association vs. union of india and others. : (1989)iillj506sc the gist of the attack on the aspect of consultation is that section 95(1) of the act provides that after consultation .....

Punjab National Bank Industrial Finance Branch Represented by Its Agm ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2007Kant9; [2006]134CompCas456(Kar)

..... judge of this court on 23.2.2005 in w.p. no. 51325/2004 (gm-res) (a. veena v. corporation bank and ors.)3. : [1994]1scr857 (a.p. state financial corporation v. gar re-rolling mills)9. the hon'ble supreme court (full bench) in the case of mardia chemicals ltd. etc. etc. v. u ..... metallurgical corporation limited and ors.8. learned counsel for the respondent - borrower has placed reliance upon the following decisions:1. 1(2005) bc 97 (drat/drt) indusind bank limited v. deva tools and forgings.2. unreported judgment rendered by the teamed single ..... for the appellant - bank has placed reliance upon the following decisions:1. ilr 2004 kar. 2661 mardia chemicals ltd. etc. etc. v. u.o.i. and ors. etc. etc.2. unreported judgment rendered by the debt recovery tribunal at chennai on 28.2.2005 in r.a. nos. 10 and 11 of 2005 asset reconstruction company (india) limited v. kumar .....

Syed Shah Muhammad Al Hussaini Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1999Kant112; ILR1999KAR8

..... case is hit by article 14 of the constitution'.to the same effect is the judgment of the apex court in m/s. east india tobacco company limited v state of andhra pradesh and another, and in state of uttar pradesh v kartar singh.12. the petitioner has not placed anything on record to show that the act is intended to ..... of conscience and freely to profess, practice and propagation of religion.14. the supreme court in ratilal punamckand gandhi v state of bombay , held:'article 25 of tne constitution guarantees to every person and not merely to the citizens of india, the freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion. this is subject, in every ..... be passed by the centre, which may be adopted as a model act by the various states. it is with this view that the present bill is introduced'. (gazette of india 1952, part ii, section 2, page 285).many enactments were in force in various states of the country before the wakf act, 1954 being act no. 29 of 1954 was .....

M/S. Uttam Distilleries Ltd. and Another Vs. the Directorate of Sugar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... for cane development and director of sugar, government of karnataka, submitted on 19.06.2007, the bank guarantee dated 18.06.2007 for `1,00,00,000/- (covered for 18 months, upto 17th december 2008), issued by the state bank of india, sib branch, navyug market, ghaziabad, in favour of the chief director (sugar), department of ..... food and public distribution, ministry of consumer affairs, government of india, new delhi for its upcoming project at mangenakoppa village, khanapur taluk, belgaum district. 11 ..... of iem, to implement it, and if not interested, to send the request for withdrawal of the bank guarantee, the 2nd petitioner by a communication dated 09.02.2010, requested the chief director (sugar), government of india, new delhi, to issue necessary order to submit the fresh iems in lieu of the two iems .....