Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 36 Court: karnataka Page 10 of about 4,510 results (0.370 seconds)

Jul 11 2003 (HC)

Smt. Latha G. Krishna Vs. the Returning Officer, Dasarahalli City Muni ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3402

..... important is that the deposit is made by the petitioner who files the petition. such a deposit could be either before the reserve bank of india, government treasury or in any branch of the state bank of india. but the very fact that instead of making the deposit before any one of these three agencies, the deposit was made by the ..... of a fee of rs. 100/- in the reserve bank of india or in a government treasury or in any branch of the state bank of india in favour of the commissioner. that the requisite amount had been deposited by the petitioner-appellant herein through his counsel sri m ..... a government treasury receipt showing that a deposit of one hundred rupees has been made by the petitioner either in the reserve bank of india or in a government treasury or in any branch of the state bank of india in favour of the commissioner'. 4. the above leaves no doubt that every election petition must be proceeded by the deposit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1998 (HC)

Cotton Corporation of India Limited,bangalore Vs. G.C. Odusumath and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2553; 1998(6)KarLJ181; (1999)ILLJ19Kant

..... also does not further the case of the appellant in that the question that arose therein for consideration of their lordships was whether the state bank of india and the nationalised banks can be said to be 'establishments under the central government' as contemplated by clause (c) of section 4(1) of tamil ..... question was examined by the supreme court in the context of various provisions and the statutes by which the said banks were created i.e., state bank of india act, 1955 and the banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertaking act, 1970. evidently the said question has little relevance to the question involved ..... fund commissioner, karnataka v workmen represented by general secretary, karnataka provident fund employees' union and another ; (2) c.v. raman v management of bank of india and another ; (3) air india statutory corporation, supra; (4) padam bahadur khanka v national institute for training and others; (5) bombay telephone canteen employees' association v mahanagar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2001 (HC)

Bpl Ltd. Vs. Inter Modal Transport Technology Systems (Karnataka) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2001]43CLA228(Kar); ILR2001KAR5373

..... 82 comp. cas. 290.27. we may now refer to the decisions which take the contrary view.27.1 in the first maharashtra state financial corpn.'s case (supra), the bombay high court held as follows ..... similar view was taken by the bombay high court in state industrial & investment corpn. of maharashtra v. maharashtra state financial corpn. [1988] 64 comp. cas. 102 and by the rajasthan high court in boolani engg. corpn. v. asup synthetics & chemicals ltd. [1994] 81 comp. cas. 872 and state bank of india v. spintex tubes & constructions ltd. [1995] ..... a aifr').2. the company secured its assets in favour of ksiidc as security for repayment of amounts advanced by ksiidc to the company. canara bank and karnataka state financial corporation ('ksfc') are the other two secured creditors of the company. an unsecured creditor of the company [pradeep industrial corporation] filed a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2016 (HC)

M/s. Gayathri Projects Ltd., Rep. By its Accounts Manager B. Subbaraju ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of india. it offers national electronic fund transfer (neft) and other contemporary banking facilities. 23. validation of online registration, e-filing and e-payment are in consonance with the i.t.act, 2000 ..... computerized branches. admittedly, petitioner's bank account number consists of 14 digits (0950400000015) which indicates that it is 'net enabled'. thus, it can be safely concluded that money in petitioner's bank account is available for transaction in every branch and atm centre across the country and beyond the territory of india. further, bank of baroda is a 'state' under article 12 of the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2018 (HC)

Dr Vijay Mallya Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Karnataka

..... g r) - 8 - w.p.no.22111/2018 c/w w.p.no.16351/2018. and1 2.3. state bank of india a banking corporation constituted under the state bank of india act1955(23 of1955 having its corporate centre at state bank bhavan madame cama road, nariman point mumbai 400 021 and having its industrial finance branch at61residency plaza residency road, bengaluru ..... 607. acting through its large corporate branch at centenary building, 28, m.g. road, bengaluru 560 001. represented by its manager.10. state bank of mysore a body corporate constituted under the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, - 5 - w.p.no.22111/2018 c/w w.p.no.16351/2018. having its head office at kempe ..... by his constituted attorney mrs.tushita patel (by sri. k.g. raghavan, sr. counsel, for sri.venkatesh murthy g r, advocate) ... petitioner state bank of india a banking corporation constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955, (23 of1955, and1 - 2 - w.p.no.22111/2018 c/w w.p.no.16351/2018. having its corporate centre at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2016 (HC)

M/S Gayathri Projects Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... constitution of india. it offers national electronic fund transfer (neft) and other contemporary banking facilities.23. validation of online registration, e-filing and e-payment are in consonance with the i.t.act ..... computerized branches. admittedly, petitioner s bank account number consists of 14 digits (0950400000015) which indicates that it is net enabled . thus, it can be safely concluded that money in petitioner s bank account is available for transaction in every branch and atm centre across the country and beyond the territory of india. :18. : further, bank of baroda is a state under article 12 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Anjanamma .n Vs. N Manjunath

Court : Karnataka

..... of a coparcenary is the right of a coparcener to seek severance of status or partition.97. reference to the decision of the supreme court, in the case of state bank of india vs. ghamandi ram, [air1969sc1330, will prove useful. that decision was merely clarifying and elaborating the incidents of coparcenaryship as always inhered in a hindu mitakshara coparcenary. the ..... land copies; (cid:1) exs.d-40 to 48 are the r.r. copies; (cid:1) ex.d.49 is the letter dated 17.08.2002 issued by the state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch to the regional transport officer, yeshwantapur, informing about cancellation of hypothecation over vehicle no.ka-04/n-5765 by t.n.manjunath; (cid:1) exs ..... .d.50 and 51 are the notices of termination of agreement of hypothecation, state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch, devanahalli taluk, bangalore district, both dated 17.08.2002; (cid:1) exs.d.52 and 53 are the receipts issued by cauvery kalpatharu grameena .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Prameela Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N

Court : Karnataka

..... of a coparcenary is the right of a coparcener to seek severance of status or partition.97. reference to the decision of the supreme court, in the case of state bank of india vs. ghamandi ram, [air1969sc1330, will prove useful. that decision was merely clarifying and elaborating the incidents of coparcenaryship as always inhered in a hindu mitakshara coparcenary. the ..... land copies; (cid:1) exs.d-40 to 48 are the r.r. copies; (cid:1) ex.d.49 is the letter dated 17.08.2002 issued by the state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch to the regional transport officer, yeshwantapur, informing about cancellation of hypothecation over vehicle no.ka-04/n-5765 by t.n.manjunath; (cid:1) exs ..... .d.50 and 51 are the notices of termination of agreement of hypothecation, state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch, devanahalli taluk, bangalore district, both dated 17.08.2002; (cid:1) exs.d.52 and 53 are the receipts issued by cauvery kalpatharu grameena .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Sri N. Manjunath Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N

Court : Karnataka

..... of a coparcenary is the right of a coparcener to seek severance of status or partition.97. reference to the decision of the supreme court, in the case of state bank of india vs. ghamandi ram, [air1969sc1330, will prove useful. that decision was merely clarifying and elaborating the incidents of coparcenaryship as always inhered in a hindu mitakshara coparcenary. the ..... land copies; (cid:1) exs.d-40 to 48 are the r.r. copies; (cid:1) ex.d.49 is the letter dated 17.08.2002 issued by the state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch to the regional transport officer, yeshwantapur, informing about cancellation of hypothecation over vehicle no.ka-04/n-5765 by t.n.manjunath; (cid:1) exs ..... .d.50 and 51 are the notices of termination of agreement of hypothecation, state bank of mysore, sadarahalli branch, devanahalli taluk, bangalore district, both dated 17.08.2002; (cid:1) exs.d.52 and 53 are the receipts issued by cauvery kalpatharu grameena .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1997 (HC)

Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant280; [1998]94CompCas1(Kar); ILR1997KAR1165; 1997(3)KarLJ1

..... puts the property to sale for realisation of its dues, by remaining outside the winding up, section 537 of the act would not apply. in state bank of india v. spintex tubes and constructions limited, reported in (1995) com cas 290 (raj) relying upon the decision of the delhi high court in ..... the present appellant m/s. karnataka state industrial investment and development corporation limited (ksiidc), respondent no. 2 karnataka state financial corporation (ksfc), respondent no. 4 industrial development bank of india (idbi) respondent-5 canara bank and respondent no. 6 syndicate bank. the said canara bank and the syndicate bank filed company application no. 153 of ..... had not arisen for consideration at all. 16. a division bench of this court itself in international coach builders limited (in liquidation) v. karnataka state financial corporation, reported in : ilr1992kar2207 , while confirming the order of the learned company judge granting permission to the ksfc, a secured creditor, to stand .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //