Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 36 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 4,510 results (0.333 seconds)

Vijaya Bank Vs. S. Bhathija and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant123; [1994]79CompCas478b(Kar); [1995]82CompCas161a(Kar); ILR1993KAR2035; 1992(2)KarLJ609

..... the actual rates of interest charged. in the prayer column, plaintiff has claimed interest at 16.25% per annum. the manager of the bank (p.w. 2) states that interest is at 5% over the reserve bank of india rate with a minimum of 14% with quarterly rests and that the first defendant had to pay additional interest at the rate of 3 ..... cases/disputes that were pending as on 15-2-1984 in any court or initiated after 15-2-1984.14. the next two decisions cited are bank of india v. karnam ranga rao, : air1986kant242 and bank of india v. c. r. ramaiinga gupta, : ilr1986kar3620 . both deal with award of interest in case of agricultural advances. hence it is not necessary to refer ..... % in the event of default. he further states that the loan was borrowed for commercial purposes and the rate of interest payable on the date of suit .....

H.P. Krishna Reddy Vs. Canara Bank, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1985Kant228; ILR1985KAR1277; 1985(2)KarLJ115

..... it contained all the debit and credit entries up to filing of the suit, with charging of interest on interest on quarterly rests. he has stated -is follows:'9. reserve bank rate of interest was 5% per annum on the dates (page 6) of exhibits p2 and p-5. 10. we have claimed interest on interest on quarterly rests. ....................................................................................................................................................13. ................................................................................................................................................. rate ..... courts to give relief to an aggrieved party when it is established that the bank in a particular case has charged interest in excess of the limit prescribed by the reserve bank of india. the reserve bank has enormous power to control advances to be made by commercial banks. the reserve bank has power to prescribe or regulate the interest rate structure on advances or other .....

N.S. Premaleelamma W/O Sri Nagaraja Setty and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Karnataka

..... laid emphasis on the decisions of the apex court in the case of aswini kumar ghose and anr v. arabinda bose and anr. : air 1952 sc 369; the central bank of india and ors. v. their workmen, etc. : air 1960 sc 12; and bhaiji v. sub-divisional officer, thandla and ors. : (2003) 1 scc 692, to ..... -government by carrying out development activities within the area of their jurisdiction. such encroachment is only incidental as the central legislation made within its competence would override state legislation covering the same field. such incidental encroachment will not make the central legislation i.e., the amendment act no. 16 of 1997 ultra vires the constitution ..... area' is unconstitutional as it impinges upon the powers of local self-governance that can be endowed upon the municipalities by the state legislature by virtue of article 243w of the constitution of india.23. while enacting the act the parliament has kept in mind the object that declaration of certain highways as national highways .....

The Director/Controller of Examinations, National Council for Hotel Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2000Kant145; ILR2000KAR2530; 2000(2)KarLJ52

..... . the institute of hotel management, catering technology and nutrition (in short the 'institution'') was established in the year 1969. it was jointly sponsored by government of india and government of karnataka. it is a registered society under the provisions of the karnataka societies registration act, 1860. it is managed by its board of governors. the ..... the national council 8. the national council is a society registered under the provisions of the societies registration act, 1860 as extended to the union territories of india (punjab amendment act, 1957). copies of its memorandum of association, examination rules, management and academic rules have been filed through personal affidavit of the director of ..... (1975)1 scc 485, 1975 lab. i.c. 819 (sc);tekraj vasandi alias k.l. basandhi v. union of india and others, air 1988 sc 469;real food products limited and others v. andhra pradesh state electricity board and others, air 1995 sc 2234, (1995)3 scc 295;managing director, orissa i.i.d.c. v. .....

Smt. Santosh Achcha Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Secretary Revenue De ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2413

..... the proper market value expressing what is the estimated market value. in the circumstances, question of predetermination of the market value does not arise.29. as stated by the state in its counter filed, having its vast experience in these type of cases without there being unguided power or procedure being followed in several cases, paies intending ..... section 45a to that effect, is ultravires the registration act and also arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. hence, this petition.11. similarly, in wp 1992/2002, it is stated that petitioner has submitted the sale deed dated 28.8.1999 for having purchased the property situate in mandy a city bearing municipal ..... to each property and thereby compelling the party to pay the stamp duty on the basis of the notification is illegal and arbitrary. it is further stated that the state has a right to collect the stamp duty which is legitimately due to it and if a citizen has under valued the property, there is a .....

Smt. Santosh Achcha W/O G.M. Sripal JaIn Vs. State of Karnataka - by I ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2007Kant77; 2007(4)KarLJ189; 2007(4)KCCRSN252; 2007(2)AIRKarR530; AIR2007Kant77

..... the proper market value expressing what is the estimated market value. in the circumstances, question of predetermination of the market value does not arise.24. as stated by the state in its counter tiled, having its vast experience in these type of cases without there being unguided power or procedure being followed in several cases, parties intending ..... section 45a to that effect, is ultravires the registration act and also arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. hence, this petition.7. similarly, in wp 1992/2002, it is stated that petitioner has submitted the sale deed dated 28.8.1999 for having purchased the property situate in mandy city bearing municipal katha ..... to each property and thereby compelling the party to pay the stamp duty on the basis of the notification is illegal and arbitrary. it is further stated that the state has a right to collect the stamp duty which is legitimately due to it and if a citizen has under valued the property, there is a .....

Ramaiah Vs. State of Karnataka by Secretary, Revenue Department and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2003Kant296; ILR2003KAR1385; 2004(2)KarLJ45

..... not invalid, since enactments i.e., act 29 of 79 washeld unconstitutional and still born in sri kudli shringeri mahasamsthana v. state (ilr 1992 kar 1877). (b) constitution of india--article 233--doctrine of defacto court and doctrine of defacto judge--case law discussed and explained:when the courts are established in exercise ..... of sovereign powerof the state and as long as such court have functioned anddischarged the duties assigned to it, the validity of ..... section 48 of the land reforms act, 1961 and not the deputy commissioner as was originally provided. 7. in 'shri kudli sringeri maha samsthanam v. state of karnataka, the constitutional validity of the karnataka inams abolition [amendment] act, 1979 under which the change aforementioned among other changes was introduced was assailed. .....

All India Gaming Federation Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... therein is profitably reproduced: 101. it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation. this being the ..... apex court said in shayara bano supra:"it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can - 101 - be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation ..... of the constitution. (vi) in support of their submission, the respondents inter alia bank upon the decisions of apex court in jilubhai nanbha kachar vs. state of gujarat10, godfrey phillips india ltd. vs. state of uttar pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro .....

Shri Pavan Nanda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... therein is profitably reproduced: 101. it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation. this being the ..... apex court said in shayara bano supra:"it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can - 101 - be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation ..... of the constitution. (vi) in support of their submission, the respondents inter alia bank upon the decisions of apex court in jilubhai nanbha kachar vs. state of gujarat10, godfrey phillips india ltd. vs. state of uttar pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro .....

Play Games 24x7 Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... therein is profitably reproduced: 101. it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation. this being the ..... apex court said in shayara bano supra:"it will be noticed that a constitution bench of this court in indian express newspapers v. union of india, (1985) 1 scc641 stated that it was settled law that subordinate legislation can - 101 - be challenged on any of the grounds available for challenge against plenary legislation ..... of the constitution. (vi) in support of their submission, the respondents inter alia bank upon the decisions of apex court in jilubhai nanbha kachar vs. state of gujarat10, godfrey phillips india ltd. vs. state of uttar pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro .....