Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 36 Page 1 of about 44,633 results (0.919 seconds)

Mahendra Budek Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT10(CG)

..... in other words, close attention must be paid to the language of the statutory provision for determining the scope of the retrospectivity intended by parliament. (see: union of india v. raghubir singh). the above position has been highlighted in principles of statutory interpretation by justice g.p. singh, (10th edn., 2006 at pp. 474 and 475 ..... construction that every statute is prima facie prospective unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made to have retrospective operation. (see: keshavan madhava menon v. state of bombay). but the rule in general is applicable where the object of the statute is to affect vested rights or to impose new burdens or to ..... is prima facie prospective unless it is expressly or by necessary implications made to have retrospective operation....11. in the matter of jayantilal amrathlal v. the union of india 0043/1971 : (1972) 4 scc 174, the supreme court observed as under:8. ...in order to see whether the rights and liabilities under the repealed law .....

Villayati Ram Mittal Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.institute for Socialist Educa ...

Court : Delhi

..... 6 of the general clauses act, 1897.7. during the hearing on 13th october, 2017, attention of the counsel for petitioners was drawn to raffles design international india private limited vs. educomp professional education limited 2016 (234) dlt349though taking a view different from that taken in ardee infrastructure pvt. ltd. supra but not noticed by ..... for the petitioners referred to i) ardee infrastructure pvt. ltd. vs. anuradha bhatia 237 (2017) dlt140(db), ii) shyam sundar vs. ram kumar air2001sc2472 iii) hitendra vishnu thakur vs. state of maharashtra (1994) 4 scc602 iv) shetty s constructions co. pvt. ltd. vs. konkan railway construction (1998) 5 scc599 v) milkfood ltd. vs. gmc ice cream (p) ..... m) no.769/2017 page 1 of 7 impugned order was appealable under section 37(1)(a) of the arbitration act.3. the counsel for the petitioners stated that the suit, from which this petition arises, was instituted in the year 2013 and the application under section 8 of the arbitration act also had been .....

Walumba Lumba (Previously Referred to as Wl) (Congo) 1 and 2 (Appellan ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... given for his detention was the risk that, if released, he would abscond. because of delay on the part of the secretary of state in making arrangements for his return to india he was still detained in december 1983. in these circumstances woolf j, at p 706, said this about the power of detention under schedule ..... vulnerable to legal challenge" and that it did not accord with the published policy. nevertheless, the question remains whether, regrettable though the behaviour of the secretary of state and her senior officials may have been, it was sufficiently outrageous and sufficiently "unconstitutional, oppressive or arbitrary" to merit awards of exemplary damages. i approach this ..... 3: "although the power which is given to the secretary of state in paragraph 2 to detain individuals is not subject to any express .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Del vs.m/s Bharat Hotels Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... the tune of about 32%. counsel for the revenue relied upon the circular of the reserve bank of india, which spells out as to what constitutes a non-banking financial company (nbfc) in terms of section 45-1a of the reserve bank of india act, 1934. it was urged that since in this case the business of money lending ..... of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (especially regulation 38 of the employees provident funds scheme, 1952) and the provisions of the employees state insurance act, 1948. the ao had brought to tax amounts which were deducted by the employer/assessee from the salaries and wages payable to its employees, as ..... the contributions deducted and actually deposited. the cumulative effect of notifications under the employees provident funds act, 1952 and the ita2712005 page 5 of 8 employees state insurance act, 1948 was that in respect of the epf scheme contributions the deductions were to be deposited within 15 days of the succeeding wage period with .....

M/s. Samson Maritime Limited, Rep. by tis Authorised Signatory KunalTr ...

Court : Chennai

..... matters. insofar as the decision of the gujarat high court reported in 2014 scc online gujarat 6737 (essar oil limited v. united india insurance company limited) is concerned, though it is stated therein that the court exercising power under section 9 of the said act either in pre-award or post-award situation has to be ..... , their cash and cash equivalents were approximately $2.9 million. the report is not indicative of how much of this is encumbered cash against bank guarantees issued to the government of india, and how much is free cash. the applicants have no access to any audited accounts for years beyond 2011-2012, hence they are unable to ..... the respondent is a foreign company and the applicant has stated that they are not having any details with regard to such assets owned by the respondent. therefore, they filed the present application and seeks the details of assets and bank accounts owned by the respondent in india. this application is opposed by contending that such course of .....

Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited vs.additional Commis ...

Court : Delhi

..... . it was held that the accounting policies adopted by an nbfc could not determine the taxable income. given the wording of section 45q of the rbi act, which states that the provisions of that chapter shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument ..... such debts, shall be chargeable to tax in the previous year in which it is credited by the public financial institution or the scheduled bank or the state financial corporation or the state industrial investment corporation or the pubic company to its profit and loss account for that year or, as the case may be, in ..... ' to the assessee since the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting. the ao held that the provisions of the reserve bank of india act ( rbi act ) read with nbfcs prudential norms (reserve bank) directions, 1998 could not have overridden the provisions of the act in terms of which the amount of interest was taxable under the .....

Megh Ratan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Rushabh Rikhav Enterp ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR361

..... the flat takers.15. mof act and rules also requires the promoter to disclose to the flat purchasers the common areas and facility and amenities. the agreement at exh. 56 states that the particulars of the common area and facilities are disclosed in the ii schedule to the agreement. however, the defendant no. 1 failed to incorporate schedule ii in the ..... the promoter has utilised fsi of any other land or property as a floating f.s.i. he is required to disclose the same to the flat takers.14. as stated earlier, the defendant no. 1 had disclosed to the flat purchasers that the total f.s.i. proposed to be consumed as per the plan at exh. 'j' was 2490 ..... the promoter and the flat taker shall comply with the prescribed form v. it may be noted that, in that prescribed form, there is an explanatory note which inter alia states that clauses 3 and 4 shall be statutory and shall be retained. it shows the intention of the legislature. note 1 clarifies that a model form of agreement has been .....

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Vs. Ms. Shiv Shakti Khansari Udyog and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... u.p. air 1956 sc 676 = 1956 scr 393, kailash nath v. state of u.p. air 1957 sc 790, basantlal banarsilal v. bansilal dagdulal air 1961 sc 823, janardan pillai v. union of india (1981) 2 scc 45, m/s. hoechst pharmaceuticals ltd. and others v. state of bihar 1983 (4) scc 45, gram panchayat of village jamalpur v. malwinder singh and ..... sub-clause (1), as the case may be, either at the gate of the factory or at the cane collection centre or transfer or deposit the necessary amount in the bank account of the seller or the co-operative society, as the case may be.(3-a) where a producer of sugar or his agent fails to make payment for the ..... produce;(h) xxxx xxxx xxxx(ix) any other purpose whereon the expenditure of the market committee fund is in the public interest, subject to the prior sanction of the state government.43. state marketing development fund.-(l) every market committee shall pay on the 10th day of every month to the board at such percentage of its gross receipts comprising of licence .....

K.K. Abraham and Company, Bharath Petroleum Dealers, Kochi (Rep. by th ...

Court : Kerala

..... , the issue is confined only with regard to the 'lubricating oil', as petrol and diesel are outside the purview of the kvat act. it is also stated that the petitioner has filed necessary returns under both the statutes, in respect of the concerned commodities and that the petitioner was under the impression that no separate ..... 1 and 2, rebutting the averments in the writ petition, particularly as to the eligibility of the petitioner and the statutory prescription in this regard. it is stated that the proceedings pursued and finalised by the concerned respondents are perfectly within the fours walls of law and not liable to be intercepted on any count. 5. ..... grievance of the petitioner originates from the time when the petitioner submitted necessary application for availing the benefit of input tax credit in the year 2006. it is stated that the petitioner had applied for obtaining the registration under the kvat act, and was granted registration, with effect from 1-4-2005, as per ext.p3 .....

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Asst. Collector of Customs and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... indicate why the rate was fixed at rs.31.44. the affidavits do not indicate that the prevalent reserve bank of india rate had been taken into consideration. strangely, the high court, adverting to this contention, stated that "... in the absence of any other material brought on record, it cannot be held that the rate ..... of exchange by the central government under section 14(3)(i) is arbitrary" and it said this after noting the contention on behalf of the appellant that the central government rate was arbitrary being different from that fixed by reserve bank of india ..... .6. the exchange rate fixed by reserve bank of india is the accepted and determinative rate of exchange for foreign exchange transactions. if it is to be deviated from to the .....