Stat - Judgment Search Results

Vinitha Vikraman Vs. Stat

Court: Kerala

(F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SMT.VINITHA VIKRAMAN, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, KUTTUR.P.O, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR.3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY SENIOR GOVT.

Dalu Singh Vs. Stat and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)531

writ of certiorari may be issued to set aside the order dated 23rd August, 1980, passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).2. Nokha-Kolayat route is a 'C' class route lying

Stat of Punjab Vs. Gurmit Singh and Anothers

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC500; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)75; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)289; 1996CriLJ4466; JT1996(9)SC125; 1996(4)KarLJ132; 1996(6)SCALE753

ORDERS.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The State of Punjab -appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act,

Balachandran Vs. Stat Eof Kerala

Court: Kerala

Matched in: Parties Balachandran Vs. Stat Eof Kerala

Stat E of Karnataka Vs. Venkataramaiah (A.2) S/O Govindappa

Court: Karnataka

OF JUNE2014PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.105 OF2009(A) BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THYAMAGONDLU P.S. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.B.VISWESHWARAIAH, HCGP) AND: SESSION CASE NO.41/2004 1. VENKATARAMAIAH (A.2) S/O

Stat of Bank of India, Kothapet Vs. Kandula Satyanand and Anothers

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD617; 2000(2)ALT363

occasion to uphold the validity of Section 21-A of the Banking Laws Amendment Act I of 1984 in State Bank of India v. Y. Venkateswara Rao, 1999 (1) Scale 131. The Supreme Court has also upheld the

Superstar Education Society Vs. Stats of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2008(3)SC104; 2008(2)SCALE573; (2008)3SCC315; 2008AIRSCW2052

ORDERK.G. Balakrishan, C.J.1. Leave granted. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and learned Counsel for the State of Maharashtra (Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3).2. In the State of Maharashtra, there are three categories of

MartIn Vs. the Stat

Court: Kerala

BALIAPADATH HOUSE, ALUVA.2. MAYA MARTIN, W/O.MARTIN, RESIDING AT BALIAPADATH HOUSE, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.3. SECRETARY, R.T.A, ERNAKULAM.4. THE KSRTC, REPRESENTED

Damodar Prasad Meena and ors Vs. Stat E and ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1702/2010 Damodar Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Along-with connected 23 writ petitions. Order dt:13. 03/2014 1/28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF

Smt. Bhagya Shree Sharma and ors Vs. Stat E and ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Smt. Bhagya Shree Sharma & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.(S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7692/2013) Date of order : : 23.04.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN