Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Stat - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 2015

Vinitha Vikraman Vs. Stat

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-09-2015

(F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SMT.VINITHA VIKRAMAN, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, KUTTUR.P.O, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR.3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY SENIOR GOVT.


Oct 23 1980

Dalu Singh Vs. Stat and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Oct-23-1980

Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)531

writ of certiorari may be issued to set aside the order dated 23rd August, 1980, passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).2. Nokha-Kolayat route is a 'C' class route lying


Sep 19 1996

Stat of Punjab Vs. Gurmit Singh and Anothers

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-19-1996

Reported in: AIR1997SC500; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)75; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)289; 1996CriLJ4466; JT1996(9)SC125; 1996(4)KarLJ132; 1996(6)SCALE753

ORDERS.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The State of Punjab -appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 2014

Balachandran Vs. Stat Eof Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

Matched in: Parties Balachandran Vs. Stat Eof Kerala


Apr 07 2020

Noufal vs Stat E of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-07-2020

THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020 /18TH CHAITHRA, 1942 Bail Appl.No.2159 OF 2020 CRIME NO.1841/2019 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PETITIONER/ACCUSED: NOUFAL, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.SAITH, PANDYARAPPILLIL HOUSE, PEZHAKKAPPILLY KARA, MULAVOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV.SRI.BIJU C. ABRAHAM


Mar 18 2025

Ramar vs Stat Through, the Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-18-2025

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Ramar ...Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, (Crime No.5 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original


Apr 23 2025

Raja Vs Stat by Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-23-2025

: 23.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.12252 of 2025 Raja S/o. Arumugan ... Petitioner / Accused-2Vs. The State represented by: The Inspector of Police, Poonamallee Police Station, Tiruvallur. (Crime No.208 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal


Jun 04 2014

Stat E of Karnataka Vs. Venkataramaiah (A.2) S/O Govindappa

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-04-2014

OF JUNE2014PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.105 OF2009(A) BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THYAMAGONDLU P.S. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.B.VISWESHWARAIAH, HCGP) AND: SESSION CASE NO.41/2004 1. VENKATARAMAIAH (A.2) S/O


Oct 01 1999

Stat of Bank of India, Kothapet Vs. Kandula Satyanand and Anothers

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-1999

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD617; 2000(2)ALT363

occasion to uphold the validity of Section 21-A of the Banking Laws Amendment Act I of 1984 in State Bank of India v. Y. Venkateswara Rao, 1999 (1) Scale 131. The Supreme Court has also upheld the


Jan 16 2008

Superstar Education Society Vs. Stats of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-16-2008

Reported in: JT2008(3)SC104; 2008(2)SCALE573; (2008)3SCC315; 2008AIRSCW2052

ORDERK.G. Balakrishan, C.J.1. Leave granted. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and learned Counsel for the State of Maharashtra (Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3).2. In the State of Maharashtra, there are three categories of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial