Split Sentence - Judgment Search Results

Ms. Geetika Panwar and Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. G ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2003Delhi317

..... and organisation of all courts it is clear that by use of this comma the sentence has been split up and the only meaning which could be attributed to the last part except the ..... supreme court and the high court will mean that it governs both the parts in the sentence mentioned earlier 33 mr gopal subramaniam .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Raghu @ Raghavbhai Vashrambhai and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2003)1GLR205

..... undertrial prisoner so far of 32 months is quite less against the maximum punishment of sentence under section 304 part ii however since more than 13 years of period of lapse ..... the object of section 235 2 in the new code 1973 is to split up the trial into two fundamental parts once the court delivers the judgment of conviction one part comes to an end the second part of trial is restricted to the .....

Lalu Alias Bhola Alias Rama Sahu and Etc. Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2003CriLJ1677

..... sentencing them thereunder 6 in the result the appeals are dismissed the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned courts below is confirmed criminal evidence of witnesses sections 395 and ..... case was splitted up and the trial in respect of the present three accused appellants were taken up 3 the learned counsel for the appellants assails the order of conviction and sentence mainly on .....

Abhimaya Basumatary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

the petitioners severe most punishment of dismissal from service the sentence imposed is contends mr mahmood so glaringly discriminatory and harsh

Uma Charan Mohanty Vs. Republic of India

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2002(I)OLR470

procedure 1973 although empowers the appellate court to suspend the sentence or the order appealed against or to release the accused

Suganthi Suresh Kumar Vs. Jagdeeshan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC681; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)417; 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)936; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)250; 2002(1)AWC610(SC); I(2002)BC564(SC); (2002)1CALLT59(SC); [2002]110CompCas133(SC); 2002CriLJ1003;

the gravity of the offence or to impose a minor sentence chosen by the trial court 14 as we propose to

Avtar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1109; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)453; JT2002(2)SC184; 2002(2)SCALE220; (2002)3SCC18; [2002]1SCR1082; 2002(1)UJ566(SC)

death shall immediately on his arrival in the prison after sentence be searched by or by order of the jailor and

State of Karnataka Vs. S. Nagaraju

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)643; JT2002(Suppl1)SC7; 2002(2)LC1246(SC)

sentence of seven years judgment of high court reducing the sentence to six months is not sustainable section 376 1 of

Y. Sreelatha @ Roja Vs. Mukanchand Bothra

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002(1)ALT(Cri)559; 2003CriLJ1938

offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act and sentenced her to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Surat Singh and Etc. Etc.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2003CriLJ386

offences under sections 392 and 397 indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years though the accused