Split Sentence - Judgment Search Results

Sely Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2002CriLJ1207

..... open to meis to set aside the order of conviction recorded by the learned sessions judge for theoffence punishable under section 55 a and remit the appeal for reconsideration of thequestion whether ..... convictionalter the acquittal nor can there be a splitting up of the trial section 386 b ii only providesfor altering the finding and maintaining the sentence and that can only apply to caseswhere the .....

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Najakat Alia Mubarak Ali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2255; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)142; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1519(SC); 2001CriLJ2588; 2001(3)Crimes9(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC279; 2001(4)SCALE71; (2001)6SCC311; [2001]3SCR600; 2001(2)LC15

the same case were used to refer to the pre sentence period of detention undergone by him nothing more can be

State of Gujarat Vs. Dharmendrasinh @ Mansinh Ratansinh Makwana

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)3GLR2593

true that the life sentence is the rule and death sentence is an exception we are satisfied that the present case

Sujata Malhotra Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(2)WLC604; 2003(1)WLN216

be removed from service but that is only the maximum sentence as provided by law 26 in chitarmal v state of

Sh. Rohluma Vs. State of Mizoram

Court: Guwahati

act it appears that the learned magistrate imposed the minimum sentence prescribed under the statute and as such i am not

Abdul Rehman Fakir Mohd. Durani Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001BomCR(Cri)517; (2001)2BOMLR752; 2001CriLJ4844

section 50 it is difficult to sustain the conviction and sentence of the appellant 7 since the distinction between sections 42

Ram Chandra Shukla Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2728; (2001)3UPLBEC2351

undoubtedly makes a mention of it at one place the sentence in the impugned order where reference is made to the

Gurbachan Singh Bhawnani Vs. the State and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002(61)DRJ63

of the criminal offence though in the matter of awarding sentence it may have some effect on the court trying the

Bangalore Rural District and Marketing Co-operative Society Limited an ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2002Kant67; 2002(1)KarLJ572

the materials are being funded by it in the fast sentence extracted above the 3rd respondent states that the materials have

Dr. Vs. Shanmughavel V. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]121TAXMAN274(Mad)

has to be mentioned only to be rejected the last sentence itself suggests that the list is not exhaustive and it