Split Sentence - Judgment Search Results

Chhatu Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1996CriLJ3313

..... trial period providhave committed crime ed that the total period ofwhich are not considered such sentence includingheinous as mentioned in remission is not less thanclause a above 14 years a reading ..... has undergone 12 years 8 months and 2 days substantive sentence as on 15 9 1995 since the day of his arrest the split up of his sentence is as under year month daysunder trial period 00 .....

Sheikh Ishaque and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995(43)BLJR921; 1995CriLJ2682; 1995(2)Crimes294(SC); JT1995(5)SC638; 1995(2)SCALE271; (1995)3SCC392; [1995]2SCR692; 1995(2)LC21(SC)

in 1973 through section 354 3 cr p c death sentence being an exception to the general rule should be awarded

Neal Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

the provision of the act that provided a mandatory minimum sentence of five years for trafficking in an lsd mixture or

Ashok Kumar Vs. the State (Delhi Administration)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC265; 1996CriLJ421; 1995(4)Crimes50(SC); JT1995(6)SC660; 1995(5)SCALE443; 1995Supp(3)SCC626

for the offence of murder under section 302 ipc and sentenced to death his co accused smt prem kanwar stands convicted

Chinnadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC546; 1995Supp(3)SCC686

judge in appeal affirmed the said orders of conviction and sentences and the high court refused to interfere in revision it

Savitri Malhotra Vs. Ram Nath Malhotra

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)618; 60(1995)DLT677; 1995(35)DRJ345

in chloride and exide batteries vs smt umawati the aforesaid sentence had come up for consideration and it was held that

Yakub and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1996CriLJ2369

malte j 1 this appeal is against the conviction and sentence of these two appellants under section 302 read with section

M.G. Gopinath Vs. S.R. Ranka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1995]83CompCas882a(Kar)

learned sessions judge considered the question of legality of the sentence and found that the order of the learned magistrate suffered

Antony Alias Appachan Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2450; 1995CriLJ4166

appellant was convicted under section 307 i p c and sentenced to five years r i 3 in the court of

Virendranath Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC490; (1996)11SCC688

no 2859 of 1992 stands allowed upsetting the convictions and sentence there were five firms in sivakasi manufacturing matches under the