Specification - Judgment Search Results

Harsiddh Specific Family Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2006]284ITR105(Guj)

to all the benefits under the said Act. A perusal of Section 2(s) indicates that it does not specifically refer to a part-time workman nor does it specifically exclude a part-time workman from the definition of :workman.

on a Specific Query Having Been Put Learned State Counsel Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

as also having inflicted injuries upon deceased Jaswinder Kaur while she was lying on the ground. On a specific query having been put, learned State counsel upon instructions from H.C.Darshan Singh would respond that the petitioner during

Prem Sahily (Specific) Trust Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1993]201ITR190(Delhi)

1. In view of the Full Bench decision of this court in Smart P. Ltd. v. Income tax Appellate Tribunal [1990] 182 ITR 384 , learned counsel for the parties agree that the order of the...

Prem Family (Specific) Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1991)39ITD78(Delhi)

us.3. The assessee claimed itself to be a private trust in which the shares of the beneficiaries were specified. It filed its return of income for assessment year 1982-83, the previous year for which was the financial

In Re: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1921Bom452; (1921)ILR45Bom1064

Chief Revenue-Authority of Bombay should, show cause, if any, why it should not, under Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act, draw up a statement of the case showing why the petitioners have not been exempt from

Jakkamreddy Venugopal Reddy and anr. Vs. Sridevi Sarannavarathrulu, Sp ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(5)ALD520; 2008(4)ALT762

ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. By this review petition, the petitioners-appellants pray for review of the judgment dated 22.03.2007, passed by this Court, dismissing the second appeal, by ordering the CMP. No. 437 of 2007, filed by them...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nijrang Specific Family Trust

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2006]287ITR148(Guj)

the deed of retirement cum dissolution read as under :3. That the party of the First Part Nijrang Specific Trust hereby grants licence to the party of the second Part Shri Bhalchandra Trust to use the name

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Harsiddh Specific Family Trust

Court: Gujarat

out an exception that where the amount is withdrawn by the assessee and is utilised for the purpose specified in the scheme in circumstances other than the circumstances specified in clauses (b), (c) and (e) of sub-section

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nima Specific Family Trust

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(2)ALLMR314; (2001)165CTR(Bom)518; [2001]248ITR29(Bom)

under section 80-I? 2. The facts giving rise to this Appeal are as follows. The assessee is a Specific Family Trust, carrying on proprietary business in the name and style of Nirma Detergent in Gujarat. It is

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 443 of 2017 Public Interest Committee for Scheduling Specific Areas and Anr ... Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors ... Respondents WITH Writ Petition (Civil) No