Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Specie - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 08 1916

The Indian Specie Bank Ltd. Vs. Nagindas Hurjivandas Nanavati

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-08-1916

Reported in: AIR1916Bom294; (1916)18BOMLR689; 35Ind.Cas.628

Macleod, J.1. This is a summary suit filed by the Indian Specie Bank (in liquidation) by its liquidator against Nagindas Hurjivandas Nanavati, who, on the 31st of July 1913, drew


Dec 08 1924

The Official Assignee of Bengal Vs. Yokohama Specie Bank Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-08-1924

Reported in: AIR1925Cal640,87Ind.Cas.392

1920, executed by or on behalf of a firm of Mogi & Co., in favour of the Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, might be declared void and inoperative. The application further was for an account of the Bank's


Apr 04 1917

Narottam Morarji Gokaldas Vs. the Indian Specie Bank

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-04-1917

Reported in: AIR1917Bom132; (1917)19BOMLR615; 41Ind.Cas.261

through his three nominees, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th plaintiffs, was the owner of 161 shares-in the Indian Specie Bank. In the month of April 1913, upon instructions from the 1st plaintiff, the share certificates and blank


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 1916

Narotam Morarji Gokuldas Vs. the Indian Specie Bank

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-17-1916

Reported in: AIR1916Bom132; (1917)19BOMLR186

Macleod, J.1. The first plaintiff was the owner of 161 shares in the Indian Specie Bank which were held for him in the names of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th plaintiffs. In April


Aug 25 1914

Hirji Khetsey Vs. the Indian Specie Bank Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-25-1914

Reported in: AIR1915Bom27; (1915)17BOMLR65

Matched in: Parties Hirji Khetsey Vs. the Indian Specie Bank Ltd.


Aug 04 2014

Raju Anthony, S/O.Anthony Appan,aged 30 Vs. the State of Telangana,rep ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-04-2014

30 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee,R/o.Plot No.16, Ganesh Nagar,Malkajgiri, Safilguda, Hyderabad....PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.1 The State of Telangana,Rep. by its Special Public Prosecutor,NCB-Sub-zone, Hyderabad....RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT Counsel for Appellant: Sri H.Srinivasa Rao Counsel for Respondent : Gopala Krishna Gokhale (for


Mar 01 1926

In Re: Mogi and Co: the Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. Vs. S. Curlender an ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-01-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Cal898

Japan and several other branches in various parts of the world. They banked with the appellants, the Yokohama Specie Bank Ltd., in the latter's branches at each place.3. The respondents Messrs. Curlender & Co., obtained a decree


Feb 18 1915

In Re: the Indian Specie Bank Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-18-1915

Reported in: (1915)17BOMLR342

the learned Chamber Judge upon four summonses taken out in the matter of the liquidation of the Indian Specie Bank. In those summonses the applicant, Sorabji Nusserwanji Pochkhanawalla, calls upon the opposing parties, C.A. Patwardhan, Damodardas Hemandas,


Sep 06 2006

S. Sivagnanam Vaidyar, Ravichandra Pharmacy Vs. the Government of Tami ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-06-2006

Reported in: (2006)4MLJ539

consumed as ordinary alcohol beverages and therefore, attract liability to pay duty irrespective of the fact whether these specific ayurvedic preparations have been included in the Schedule as restricted preparations or not. Against that, writ petitions were


Mar 01 1926

In Re: Mogi and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-01-1926

Reported in: 96Ind.Cas.459

Japan and several other branches in various parts of the world. They banked with the appellants, The Yokohama Specie Bank Ltd. in the latter's branches at each place.3. The respondents, Messrs. Curlender, & Co. obtained a decree


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial